Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kennedy, 585 N.W.2d 385.
- State v. Stewart 643 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 2002
- State v. Vick 632 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2001
-
State v. Vick
632 N.W.2d 676
Minn. 2001
-97 (Minn.1995); see State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 496-97
- State v. Marchbanks 632 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Marchbanks 632 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Walthers 620 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Walthers
620 N.W.2d 727
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
180 , 145 L.Ed.2d 151 (1999); -81 (Minn.1999) (allowing evidence of subsequent robbery to show identity and modus operandi of masked assailant in felony-murder trial); (allowing evidence that the defendant sexually assaulted the victim in a similar manner six months after the charged incident to rebut defendant’s allegation that the victim fabricated the incident); -37 (Minn.1998) (allowing evidence of defendant’s prior assault of
- State v. Jackson 615 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Jackson 615 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Duncan 608 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Duncan 608 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Broulik 606 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2000
-
State v. Broulik
606 N.W.2d 64
Minn. 2000
(using the standard cautionary instructions “assured that the jury did not give improper weight to the evidence”); (explaining that CRIMJIGs 2.01 and 3.16 lessen ‘the probability of undue weight being given by the jury to the evidence”).
- State v. Morris 606 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2000
-
State v. Morris
606 N.W.2d 430
Minn. 2000
“Absent a clear abuse of discretion, evidentiary rulings generally rest within the trial court’s discretion.”
- State v. Reckinger 603 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Reckinger
603 N.W.2d 331
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-92 (Minn.1998) (quotation omitted).