Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Behl, 564 N.W.2d 560.

98 citing documents.

Minn. 2020
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2018
“If a statute does not implicate a fundamental right, we assess its cons titutionality using rational basis revie w.” ().
Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This requirement reflects the principle that the state is not required to treat individuals who are “different in fact or opinion as though they were the same in law.”
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melvin Matthew Willems Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melvin Matthew Willems Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr. 859 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr. 859 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gene Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gene Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 560, 566 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Suzanne Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Suzanne Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that when no fundamental right is at issue, a law must be “a reasonable means to a permissive object”); (stating that when a fundamental right is limited, a law will be upheld “if it is necessary to serve a compelling governmental inte
Dean v. City of Winona 843 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dean v. City of Winona 843 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Grigsby 818 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012
State v. Grigsby 818 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and we will find a statute unconstitutional only “when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted); see also Rio Vista Non- Profit Hous.
State v. Wiseman 816 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Wiseman 816 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of M.L.M. 813 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 2012
State v. Johnson 813 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2012
State v. Johnson 813 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2012
In re the Welfare of M.L.M. 813 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 2012
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-65 (Minn.1997), the supreme court rejected the argument that once a jury acquits a juvenile of the allegation on which the district court’s jurisdiction was based, the district court can no longer sentence him as an adult without first granting him a certification-type hearing.
State v. Cox 798 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2011
State v. Cox 798 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2011
We have embraced the rationale of the U.S. Supreme Court by explaining that the Equal Protection Clause “does not require the state to treat things that are different in fact or opinion as though they were the same in law.” see also Ri- *522 naldi v. Yeager, 384 U.S. 305, 309 , 86 S.Ct.
Paquin v. MacK 788 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 2010
Beaulieu v. MacK 788 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
Paquin v. MacK 788 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 2010
Beaulieu v. MacK 788 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
In Re the Welfare of M.L.M. 781 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re the Welfare of M.L.M. 781 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“The guarantee of equal protection of the laws requires that the state treat all similarly situated persons alike.”
Thompson v. Commissioner of Health 778 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Thompson v. Commissioner of Health 778 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“The guarantee of equal protection of the laws requires that the state treat all similarly situated persons alike.” Greene v. Comm’r of Minn. Dept. of Human Servs., (), aff'd
State v. Johnson 777 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Johnson 777 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“The guarantee of equal protection of the laws requires that the state treat all similarly situated persons alike.”
State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
State v. J.E.S. 763 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. JES 763 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. JES 763 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. J.E.S. 763 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 733 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 733 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“The guarantee of equal protection of the laws requires that the state treat all similarly situated persons alike.”
State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be “exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (quotation omitted).