Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital, 598 N.W.2d 379.
- Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 615 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2000
- Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 615 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2000
- City of Mahtomedi v. One 1995 Chevrolet Blazer, Vin: 1GNCT18W9S2124110 609 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
City of Mahtomedi v. One 1995 Chevrolet Blazer, Vin: 1GNCT18W9S2124110
609 N.W.2d 913
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
“The proper construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo.”
- Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Ashbach Construction Co. 608 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Ashbach Construction Co. 608 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Loge 608 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2000
-
State v. Loge
608 N.W.2d 152
Minn. 2000
See, Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dept. Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360 , (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives.”).