Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Williams, 608 N.W.2d 837.
-
State v. Hager
727 N.W.2d 668
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The single behavioral incident rule “protects defendants from both multiple sentences and multiple prosecutions and ensures that punishment [is] commensurate with the criminality of defendants’] misconduct.” (quotation omitted).
- Hankerson v. State 723 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2006
-
Hankerson v. State
723 N.W.2d 232
Minn. 2006
See, -26 (Minn.2001) (reversing the district court’s calculation of criminal history *241 score and remanding for a resentencing hearing with instructions for the district court to reconsider defendant’s foreign convictions based on statutory guidelines); 843 (Minn.2000) (reversing the sentence and remanding for a resentencing hearing with instructions for the district court to “separately identify[] the aggravating factors supporting each sentencing departure”).
- State v. Carr 692 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Carr 692 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
State v. Bertsch
689 N.W.2d 276
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
will be commensurate with the criminality of defendant’s misconduct.’ ” (citations omitted).
- State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Leja 684 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 2004
- State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
- State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
- Neal v. State 658 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2003
- Neal v. State 658 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2003
- State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
State v. Johnson
653 N.W.2d 646
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(holding the state has the burden to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the conduct underlying offenses did not occur as part of a single behavioral incident).
- State v. McCoy 631 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. McCoy 631 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2001