Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wayne v. State, 601 N.W.2d 440.

33 citing documents.

Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
Wayne v. State ( Wayne III ), , 441 (Minn. 1999).
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 2015
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 2015
See Wayne v. State (Wayne II), d 446, 448 (Minn. 1993); Wayne v. State (Wayne III), Wayne v. State (Wayne IV), Wayne v. State (Wayne V), Wayne v. State (Wayne VI), Wayne v. State (Wayne VII), -21 (Minn. 2015).
Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota 869 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2015
Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota 869 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2015
We have long held that the Knaffla rule bars any claims that were, or could have been, raised in a prior postconviction 4 petition.2
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 866 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2015
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 866 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2015
Wayne v. State (Wayne II), Wayne v. State (Wayne III), Wayne v. State (Wayne IV), Wayne v. State (Wayne V), Wayne v. State (Wayne VI)
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 860 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 2015
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 860 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 2015
Wayne I, Wayne v. State (Wayne II), Wayne v. State (Wayne III), Wayne v. State (Wayne IV), Wayne v. State (Wayne V)
Terelle Eugene Shaw v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Terelle Eugene Shaw v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Terence Jerome Wilson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Terence Jerome Wilson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that claims which could have been raised in previous postconviction petitions were barred under the Knaffla rule despite the petitioner having never filed a direct appeal).
Maurice Level Ward, Sr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Maurice Level Ward, Sr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
Wayne v. State 832 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2013
Wayne v. State 832 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2013
Wayne v. State (Wayne IV), Wayne v. State (Wayne III), Wayne v. State (Wayne II)
Quick v. State 757 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 2008
Quick v. State 757 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 2008
This rule also precludes consideration of “claims which appellant raised or knew of and could have raised in earlier review.”
Wayne v. State 747 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 2008
Wayne v. State 747 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 2008
1 Wayne v. State (Wayne III), Wayne v. State (Wayne II)
Brown v. State 746 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 2008
Brown v. State 746 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 2008
Hathaway v. State 741 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2007
Hathaway v. State 741 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2007
Jihad v. State 714 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 2006
Jihad v. State 714 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 2006
Washington v. State 675 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2004
Washington v. State 675 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2004
[1] (citing Knaffla, 309 Minn. at 252 , d at 741 (1976)).
Jones v. State 671 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 2003
441 (Minn.1999) (citing State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , (the “Knaffla rule”)).