Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Duncan, 608 N.W.2d 551.

62 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    Error “It is improper for the [state] to make statements urging the jury to protect society or to send a message with its verdict.” review denied (Minn. May 16, 2000).
  • State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    Clark, d at 377 ; review denied (Minn. May 16, 2000).
  • State v. Montgomery 707 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Montgomery 707 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    (cumulative effect of trial errors, including prose-cutorial misconduct, warranted a new trial).
  • State v. Boehl 697 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Boehl 697 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    -41 (Minn.1993); see also State u Duncan, review denied (Minn. May 16, 2000).
  • County of Stearns v. Barnell 693 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • County of Stearns v. Barnell 693 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    nn.App.1998) (awarding attorney fees where appellants did not have reasonable basis in law or fact to bring appeal and striking portions of appellants’ briefs for failing to provide citations, relying on extra-record assertions, and making repeated erroneous assertions of fact), or demonstrate use of the brief “as a vehicle for disrespect, insult, and slanderous accusations,” review denied (Minn. May 16, 2000), Barnell has not demonstrated that this is an appropriate case for an attorney fee awa
  • State v. Hoppe 641 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Hoppe 641 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    review denied (Minn. May 16, 2000).