Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Noska, 331 N.W.2d 917.
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, judgment creditor, Respondent/Co-Appellant v. Justin Beauchane, Judgment Debtor, and North Star Mutual … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, judgment creditor, Respondent/Co-Appellant v. Justin Beauchane, Judgment Debtor, and North Star Mutual …
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
921 (Minn. 1983), the exception does not apply here.
- Bundul v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 753 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Bundul v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 753 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Star Windshield Repair, Inc. v. Western National Insurance Co. 744 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Star Windshield Repair, Inc. v. Western National Insurance Co. 744 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
-
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
722 N.W.2d 283
Minn. 2006
924-25 n. 6 (Minn.1983); Hooper v. Zurich Am.
- Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Leamington Co. v. Nonprofits' Insurance Ass'n 661 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Leamington Co. v. Nonprofits' Insurance Ass'n 661 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schmitt 651 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schmitt 651 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Duffy 618 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Duffy 618 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Zimmerman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 593 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Zimmerman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
593 N.W.2d 248
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(providing that insurance policy is contract, subject to general principles of contract law).
- Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co. 588 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co. 588 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- More Clinic v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 575 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
More Clinic v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
575 N.W.2d 598
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(use-of-motor-vehicle exclusion applies to fire caused by burning embers in back of pickup truck, but claims covered because fire also independently caused by act of placing embers in truck); Wood-rich Const. Co. v. Indemnity Ins.
- Vetter v. Security Continental Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1997
- Vetter v. Security Continental Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1997
- Austin Mutual Insurance Co. v. Klande 563 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Austin Mutual Insurance Co. v. Klande 563 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
-
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.
563 N.W.2d 724
Minn. 1997
924-25 n. 6 (Minn.1983).
- Epland v. Meade Insurance Agency Associates, Inc. 564 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1997
- Epland v. Meade Insurance Agency Associates, Inc. 564 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1997
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.
552 N.W.2d 738
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
which addressed claims that the insured had made misrepresentations or committed fraud.
- Hooper v. Zurich American Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 31 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Hooper v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
552 N.W.2d 31
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
925 n. 6 (Minn.1983) (where loss has occurred, there is no longer any risk); Oster v. Riley, 276 Minn. 274, 287 , (Otis, J. dissenting) (“it is absurd to assume that a company can legally bind itself to a loss which at the time of the initial *35 undertaking it knows has already taken place”
- Kern v. Auto Owners Insurance Co. 526 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Kern v. Auto Owners Insurance Co. 526 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 505 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1993
-
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben
505 N.W.2d 323
Minn. 1993
(in insurance contracts, as with other contracts, the parties’ minds must meet as to terms).
- Vang v. Vang 490 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Vang v. Vang 490 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. Seefeld 481 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1992
-
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Seefeld
481 N.W.2d 62
Minn. 1992
In this case, we conclude that the trial court erred in holding that the negligent design and construction of the utility trailer was an independent, non-vehicle-related
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Strope 481 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Strope
481 N.W.2d 853
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(actual movement of vehicle fanned ashes into flames which left vehicle and started grass fires); State Farm Mut.
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. Seefeld 472 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. Seefeld 472 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Smith v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 455 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Smith v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.
455 N.W.2d 499
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bobich v. Oja, 258 Minn. 287, 294 , see also Minn.Stat.