No. 43445 Precedential Affirmed Processed

State v. Dunham

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed January 12, 1973

Opinion text

Highlighting matches for “habeas corpus” · clear

Per Curiam. Defendant contends on this appeal from an order of the district court quashing a writ of habeas corpus that the state did not produce enough evidence at the preliminary hearing to establish probable cause for believing him guilty of the offense charged. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in quashing the writ. Affirmed.