Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lee v. Arrowood, 224 N.W.2d 489.

52 citing documents.

Roller-Dick v. Centracare Health Sys. 916 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Suzanne Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Suzanne Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
at 1566 (plurality opinion); see In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207, (determining that “[e]ven dictum, if it contains an expression of the opinion of the court, is entitled to considerable weight”).
Vangelder v. Johnson 827 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Vangelder v. Johnson 827 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See Kronzer v. First Nat’l Bank of Minneapolis, 305 Minn. 415, 428-29 , (holding that when a party waived its right to challenge the validity of an amendment to a will in a stipulation, it was collaterally estopped from raising the challenge later); see also In re Bush’s Estate, 302 Minn. 188, 208-09 , -02 (Minn.1974) (holding that failure to appeal a stipulation made it binding regardless of whether a party affirmatively consented to it).
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 811 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 811 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , (“Even dictum, if it contains an expression of the opinion of the [supreme] court, is entitled to considerable weight.”).
John Ward Gillman Engraved June 20, 1775 Copper Printing Plate v. Heritage Auctions, Inc. 806 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
John Ward Gillman Engraved June 20, 1775 Copper Printing Plate v. Heritage Auctions, Inc. 806 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
at 177-78 , d at 396 ; see also In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , (“Even dictum, if it contains an expression of the opinion of the court, is entitled to considerable weight.”).
SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM 755 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM 755 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , , 501 (1974); (relying on dicta in a supreme court decision to reach its holding), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 745 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 745 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , , 501 (1974) (stating supreme court dictum given considerable weight when it expresses the court’s opinion); Pecinovsky v. AMCO Ins.
Simons v. Shiltz 741 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Simons v. Shiltz 741 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Though the supreme court’s caveat in Oldewurtel is speculation and was not *910 essential to the court’s holding, the supreme court’s dicta are given “considerable weight.” In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207
Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Gibson v. Trustees of the Minnesota State Basic Building Trades Fringe Benefits Funds 703 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Gibson v. Trustees of the Minnesota State Basic Building Trades Fringe Benefits Funds 703 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
it should not be ignored, and is entitled to great weight”) (citing In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 208 , ); Bush, 302 Minn. at 207 , d at 501 (stating supreme court dictum is entitled to “considerable weight” if it contains “an expression of the opinion of the court”).
Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
It is well settled that “dictum, if it contains an expression of the opinion of the court, is entitled to considerable weight.” In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207
State v. McCoy 668 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. McCoy 668 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating that court is not bound by higher court’s statement in dicta, but only by its holding); cf. In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , (ascribing weight to dicta that contains strong expression of court’s opinion).
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Newton 646 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Newton 646 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cf. In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , (stating that supreme court dicta is entitled to "considerable weight” if it contains "an expression of the opinion of the court”).
State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Brua v. Olson 621 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Brua v. Olson 621 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
see In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , (stating that supreme court dicta is entitled to “considerable weight” if it contains “an expression of the opinion of the court”).
State v. Busse 616 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Busse 616 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
that dicta as our holding: When a district court is considering whether to allow a party to repudiate or withdraw from a dissolution stipulation which has not yet been incorporated into a dissolution judgment, the district court is to consider whether the stipulation was “improvidently made and in equity and good conscience ought not to stand.” Shirk, d at 522 ; see In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , (stating that supreme court dicta is entitled to “considerable weight” if it contains “a
State v. Zornes 584 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Zornes 584 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See generally In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207 , (stating that dicta are entitled to “considerable weight” if they contain “an expression of the opinion of the court”).
Petition of Willmus 568 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Petition of Willmus 568 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Kane, 237 Minn. at 267 , d at 337 ; (holding, while dicta in an opinion of the supreme court “is not conclusive evidence of the law and is not entitled to stare decisis deferenee[,] * * * it should not be ignored and is entitled to great weight”) (citing In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 208 , 224 *).
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 566 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1997
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 566 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1997
In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 211 , (citation omitted).
Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A. 534 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A. 534 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 205 , cert.
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Wylde 454 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1990
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Wylde 454 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1990
In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 208 , cert.
Gulbranson v. Gulbranson 408 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gulbranson v. Gulbranson 408 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 206 , (citation omitted), ce rt.
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington 390 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington 390 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
While we agree that the Berg footnote is not essential to the court’s holding, such dicta, “if it contains an expression of the opinion of the court, is entitled to considerable weight.” In Re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188, 207
Burma v. Stransky 357 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1984
Burma v. Stransky 357 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1984
In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188 , cert.
Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
See, In re Estate of Bush, 302 Minn. 188 , In re Application of Schaefer to Register Title, 287 Minn. 490 , Pangalos v. Halpern, 247 Minn. 80
Spannaus v. Arrowood 230 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1975