Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation, 241 N.W.2d 781.

97 citing documents.

Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable John P. Dehen Minn. 2025
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
In re Craig E. Cascarano, State of Minnesota v. Michael Demond Rashaun Mason 871 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Craig E. Cascarano, State of Minnesota v. Michael Demond Rashaun Mason 871 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 176, ).
Grant County Social Services, Natasha Kaiser, OBO A.C.R., Ward of the Commissioner of the State of MN v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Court’s Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 176
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 176 , (noting that inherent judicial power “governs that which is essential” to the existence of the judiciary as a functioning court and rests its authority in “the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers”).
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013
State v. M.D.T. 815 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. M.D.T. 815 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 180 , ).
State v. Randolph 800 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 2011
State v. Randolph 800 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 2011
Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 177 , (quoting Minn. Const, art. I, § 8).
State v. Obeta 796 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2011
State v. Obeta 796 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2011
Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 180
State v. MLA 785 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. M.L.A. 785 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. M.L.A. 785 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(quoting In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 181 , ).
State v. MLA 785 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(quoting In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 181 , ).
State v. N.G.K. 770 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. NGK 770 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. N.G.K. 770 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(quoting In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 182 , ).
State v. NGK 770 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(quoting In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 182 , ).
State v. S.L.H. 755 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 2008
State v. SLH 755 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 2008
State v. S.L.H. 755 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 2008
3 *275 The judiciary’s inherent authority “grows out of express and implied constitutional provisions mandating a separation of powers and a viable judicial branch of government.” 4 In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 180
State v. SLH 755 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 2008
[4] In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 180
State v. V.A.J. 744 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. VAJ 744 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. V.A.J. 744 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
at 811 (citing In re Clerk of Lyon County *677 Courts’ Comp., 308 Minn. 172, 177 , ).
State v. VAJ 744 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
at 811 (citing In re Clerk of Lyon County *677 Courts' Comp, 308 Minn. 172, 177 , ).
State v. Chauvin 723 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2006
State v. Chauvin 723 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2006
A court’s inherent judicial authority “grows out of express and implied constitutional provisions mandating a separation of powers and a viable judicial branch of government.” In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 180
State v. Schultz 676 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Schultz 676 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(quoting Clerk of Lyon County v. Lyon County Comm’rs, 308 Minn. 172, 176 , ).
State v. Costello 646 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 2002
State v. Costello 646 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 2002
A district court clearly has the inherent power to “govern[ ] that which is essential to [its] existence, dignity, and function,” but that discretion is only properly exercised when it is a means to “the disposition of individual cases * * * ‘conformable to the laws.’ ” In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176-77 , (quoting Minn. Const, art. 1, § 8).
State v. Cheng 623 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 2001
for Lyon County v. Lyon County Comm’rs, 308 Minn. 172 , 176, , 784 (1976).
In Re Estate of Janecek 610 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2000
In Re Estate of Janecek 610 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2000
See In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 180 , (“Inherent judicial power grows out of express and implied constitutional provisions mandating a separation of powers and a viable judicial branch of government.
State v. T.M.B. 590 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. TMB 590 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. T.M.B. 590 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
This inherent authority extends only to “that which is essential to the existence, dignity, and function of a court because it is a court.” In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176
State v. TMB 590 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
See Clerk of Court’s Compensation for Lyon County v. Lyon County Comm’rs, 308 Minn. 172, 179 , (citation omitted) (explaining that we may exercise our inherent judicial power when it is necessary to perform our judicial function).
State v. Erickson 589 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1999
State v. Erickson 589 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1999
The inherent power of this court includes “the right to enable [the court] to administer justice whether any previous form of remedy has been granted or not.” In re Clerk of Lyon County Court’s Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176 , (quoting In re Greathouse, 189 Minn. 51, 55 , 248 N.W.
State v. Tatum 556 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1996
State v. Tatum 556 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1996
In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts’ Compensation, 308 Minn. 172, 176-77
State v. Krotzer 548 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1996