Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Miller v. Foley, 317 N.W.2d 710.
- Allstate Sales & Leasing Co. v. Geis 412 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Allstate Sales & Leasing Co. v. Geis 412 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Central Lakes Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 743 411 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Central Lakes Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 743 411 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Krueger v. Washington Federal Savings Bank of Montevideo 406 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Krueger v. Washington Federal Savings Bank of Montevideo 406 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Crowley Co. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 394 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Crowley Co. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 394 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- M.G.M. Liquor Warehouse International, Inc. v. Forsland 371 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- M.G.M. Liquor Warehouse International, Inc. v. Forsland 371 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Integrated Development & Manufacturing Co. v. University of Minnesota 363 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Integrated Development & Manufacturing Co. v. University of Minnesota
363 N.W.2d 845
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444 , ).
- Miller v. City of Saint Paul 363 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Miller v. City of Saint Paul 363 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Yager v. Thompson 352 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Yager v. Thompson
352 N.W.2d 71
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(object of temporary injunction is to maintain the matter in controversy in its- existing condition until judgment, so that the effect of the judgment shall not be impaired by the acts of the parties during the litigation).
- OT Industries, Inc. v. OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg AB 346 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
OT Industries, Inc. v. OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg AB
346 N.W.2d 162
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
This court, citing Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 272 Minn. 264 , has specified five factors to be considered in determining whether a temporary injunction should issue: (1) the nature of the relationship between the parties before the dispute giving rise to the request for relief; (2) the harm to be suffered by the moving party if the preliminary injunction is denied a
- Edin v. Jostens, Inc. 343 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Edin v. Jostens, Inc.
343 N.W.2d 691
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
ANALYSIS The factors to be considered in determining whether to grant preliminary injunctive relief were outlined in Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 272 Minn. 264 , : (1) the nature of the relationship between the parties before the dispute giving rise to the request for relief; (2) the harm to be suffered by the moving party if the preliminary injunction is denied as compared to that inflicted on the non-moving party if the injunction issues pending trial; (3) the lik