No. A12-1062
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Preston v. Hitchin Rail, Inc.
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed on June 4, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that ([s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,) doing no more than establishing the law of the case)). *627 BY THE COURT: /s/_ Alan C. Page Associate Justice
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. A12-1226 | Minn. | 2012-12-10 | Affirmed | Yarbrough v. First Student Inc. |
| No. A12-2350 | Minn. | 2013-10-01 | Affirmed | Drier v. Grounded Air, Inc. |
| No. A12-2336 | Minn. | 2013-12-06 | Affirmed | Garner v. Mobil Washer |
| No. A12-2351 | Minn. | 2013-10-01 | Affirmed | Mironenko v. Grounded Air, Inc. |
| No. A12-2036 | Minn. | 2013-06-10 | Affirmed | Cummings v. Kelly Services & Indemnity Co. of North America |