Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Disciplinary Action Against Goldstein, 581 N.W.2d 36.
-
Sprint Spectrum LP v. Commissioner of Revenue
676 N.W.2d 656
Minn. 2004
July 18, 1997), aff'd by an equally divided court, (“RSA 10 ”), that had found telephone equipment to qualify for exemption based on the statute prior to the 1993 amendment.
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham 609 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 2000
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham
609 N.W.2d 894
Minn. 2000
(disbarring attorney for violating terms of probation, misappropriation of client funds, noncooperation, and exhibiting a pattern of neglect, noncommunication, and failure to return client files and unearned retainers); (disbarring attorney for misappropriation of client funds, client neglect, failure to pursue or properly handle client matters, unauthorized practice of law, and noncooperation).