Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Karon v. Karon, 435 N.W.2d 501.

87 citing documents.

Santillan v. Martine 560 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
see 1989 Minn. Laws ch. 248, § 7 (codified at Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Kahn v. Tronnier 547 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Kahn v. Tronnier 547 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
3 and reinstated the district court’s ruling.
Loo v. Loo 520 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1994
Loo v. Loo 520 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1994
This case arises out of a that a waiver of the statutory right to move for modification of spousal maintenance, if contained in a stipulation that a trial court has incorporated in a judgment and decree of marital dissolution, is enforceable.
Wilson v. Speer 499 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner 487 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner 487 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-08 (Minn.App.1989), pet.
Ruzic v. City of Eden Prairie 479 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ruzic v. City of Eden Prairie 479 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Telma v. Telma 474 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1991
Marriage of Telma v. Telma 474 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1991
Marriage of Mahoney v. Mahoney 474 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Geiger v. Geiger 470 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Geiger v. Geiger 470 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(express waiver of maintenance).
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 469 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 469 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Therefore, unlike the waivers in [ ] and [ pet.
Northpointe Plaza v. City of Rochester 465 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1991
Northpointe Plaza v. City of Rochester 465 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1991
505 n. 1 (Minn.1989) (Coyne, J., dissenting).
Borgeson v. Borgeson 461 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Borgeson v. Borgeson 461 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
The trial court found that respondent’s waiver of future maintenance did not evi-' dence a “clear and distinct intent * * * to divest the Court of any right to extend the period of maintenance”
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 449 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 449 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Schreck v. Schreck 445 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Schreck v. Schreck 445 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Keating v. Keating 444 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Nelsen v. Nelsen 444 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Nelsen v. Nelsen 444 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Keating v. Keating 444 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Berens v. Berens 443 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Berens v. Berens 443 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Did the trial court lack jurisdiction to consider Joanne’s ?
Weber v. Sentry Insurance 442 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Weber v. Sentry Insurance 442 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Glorvigen v. Glorvigen 438 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Glorvigen v. Glorvigen 438 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
We do not believe such a
Marriage of Prange v. Prange 437 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Prange v. Prange 437 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
We are not here concerned with a

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by