Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Larson v. Chase, 50 N.W. 238.
- Jodi L. Toedter, Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Susan Ann Gray v. Winona County, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Jodi L. Toedter, Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Susan Ann Gray v. Winona County, …
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
95, 96-97 (1934) (deputy coroner in possession of body); Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307, 307, 50 N.W.
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Neises 598 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Neises
598 N.W.2d 709
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307, 312 , 50 N.W.
- Zagaros v. Erickson 558 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Zagaros v. Erickson
558 N.W.2d 516
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307, 310-11 , 50 N.W.
- Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 544 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1996
-
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
544 N.W.2d 21
Minn. 1996
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360 , Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , 50 N.W.
- Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 345 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1984
-
Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
345 N.W.2d 209
Minn. 1984
E.g., Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307, 311 , 50 N.W.
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of Isle 122 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1963
-
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of Isle
122 N.W.2d 36
Minn. 1963
Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , , 14 L. R. A. 85; Purcell v. St.
- Hale v. Brown 323 P.2d 955 Ariz. 1958
- Sworski v. Simons 293 N.W. 309 Minn. 1940
-
Sworski v. Simons
293 N.W. 309
Minn. 1940
The complaint in this case is the same in its ultimate allegations as that considered in the leading case of Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , 310 , 50 N.W.
- Kingsley v. Forsyth 257 N.W. 95 Minn. 1934
-
Kingsley v. Forsyth
257 N.W. 95
Minn. 1934
Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , , 14 L. R. A. 85, 28 A. S. R. 370; Lindh v. G. N. Ry.
- Johnson v. Sampson 208 N.W. 814 Minn. 1926
-
Johnson v. Sampson
208 N.W. 814
Minn. 1926
In Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , , 14 L. R. A. 85, 28 Am.
- Nemec v. Brown 184 N.W. 956 Minn. 1921
-
Nemec v. Brown
184 N.W. 956
Minn. 1921
1785; Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 -311, , 14 L.R.A.
- Woods v. Graham 167 N.W. 113 Minn. 1918
-
Woods v. Graham
167 N.W. 113
Minn. 1918
The law of the case is settled by Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , , 14 L.R.A.
- Johnson v. Bankers Mutual Casualty Insurance 151 N.W. 413 Minn. 1915
-
Johnson v. Bankers Mutual Casualty Insurance
151 N.W. 413
Minn. 1915
Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , , 14 L.R.A.
- Beaulieu v. Great Northern Railway Co. 114 N.W. 353 Minn. 1907
-
Beaulieu v. Great Northern Railway Co.
114 N.W. 353
Minn. 1907
v. Sharpe, 7 Cox, C. C. 214), a right of possession and preservation for burial purposes is conceded by nearly all the authorities,, which the law will protect (Regina v. Fox, 2 Q. B. 246; Williams v. Williams, 20 Ch. Div. 659; Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , , 14 L. R. A. 85, 28 Am.
- Lindh v. Great Northern Railway Company 109 N.W. 823 Minn. 1906
-
Lindh v. Great Northern Railway Company
109 N.W. 823
Minn. 1906
This case is concluded by Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , , 14 L. R. A. 85, 28 Am.
- Sanderson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 92 N.W. 542 Minn. 1902
-
Sanderson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
92 N.W. 542
Minn. 1902
In the case of Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , , it was stated as a rule that no action for damages will lie for an act which, though wrongful, infringed no legal right of the plaintiff, although it may have caused him mental suffering.
- Brown v. Maplewood Cemetery Ass'n 89 N.W. 872 Minn. 1902
-
Brown v. Maplewood Cemetery Ass'n
89 N.W. 872
Minn. 1902
Pierce v. Proprietors, 10 R. I. 227; Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , .
- Bucknam v. Great Northern Railway Co. 79 N.W. 98 Minn. 1899
-
Bucknam v. Great Northern Railway Co.
79 N.W. 98
Minn. 1899
There may have been cases, in actions of tort, where substantial damages have been recovered for mental suffering, — as cases of assault without battery, false imprisonment where there was no physical contact, breach of promise of marriage, and seduction, where a parent brings the action; but, as was said in Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , at page 311 : “For the law to furnish redress, there must be an act which, under the circumstances, is wrongful; and it must take effect upon the person, the
- Francis v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 59 N.W. 1078 Minn. 1894
-
Francis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
59 N.W. 1078
Minn. 1894
47 Minn. 307 , ( ,) perhaps goes as far in that direction as any case to be found in the books.