Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Joannin v. Ogilvie, 52 N.W. 217.

32 citing documents.

Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Caselaw recognizes that “it is well settled that the mere refusal of a party to pay a debt or to perform a contract is not duress, so as to avoid a contract procured by means of such refusal, although the other party was influenced in entering into it by his financial necessities.”
Viele Contracting, Inc. v. Performance Pipelining, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Viele Contracting, Inc. v. Performance Pipelining, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[M]oney paid voluntarily, with full knowledge of the facts, cannot be recovered back.” Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564, 566, 52 N.W.
Wise v. Midtown Motors, Inc. 42 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1950
Wise v. Midtown Motors, Inc. 42 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1950
2 Brown County Bank v. Hage, 156 Minn. 160 , 195 N. W. *52 275; Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , , 16 L. R. A. 376, 32 A. S. R. 581; Winget v. Rockwood (8 Cir.) 69 F. (2d) 326; 2 Dunnell, Supp. § 2848.
True v. Older 34 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1948
Moore v. Village of Gilbert 289 N.W. 837 Minn. 1940
Moore v. Village of Gilbert 289 N.W. 837 Minn. 1940
Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , , 16 L. R. A. 376, 32 A. S. R. 581; Kelly v. Tyra, 103 Minn. 176 , , , 17 L.R.A.
Braun v. Hamack 289 N.W. 553 Minn. 1940
Steblay v. Johnson 260 N.W. 364 Minn. 1935
Steblay v. Johnson 260 N.W. 364 Minn. 1935
To constitute duress there must be “such pressure or constraint as compels a man to go against his avüI, and virtually takes aAvay his free agency, and destroys the poAver of refusing to comply with the unlawful demand of another, * * *, irrespective of the manifestation or apprehension of physical force.” Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564, 566 , , 16 L. R. A. 376, 32 A. S. R. 581; Snyder v. Samuelson, 140 Minn. 57 , ; BroAvn County Bank v. Hage, 156 Minn. 460 , ; American Nat.
Horn v. City of Minneapolis 234 N.W. 289 Minn. 1930
Horn v. City of Minneapolis 234 N.W. 289 Minn. 1930
The authorities are discussed in Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , , 16 L. R. A. 376, 32 A. S. R. 581, which plaintiff urges should control here.
Zimmermann v. Benz 202 N.W. 272 Minn. 1925
Zimmermann v. Benz 202 N.W. 272 Minn. 1925
The claim sought to be enforced here was an admittedly valid claim, against property of an estate owing the same and thus distinguished from the claim in Joan-nin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , , 16 L. R. A. 376, 32 Am.
Brown County Bank v. Hage 156 Minn. 460 Minn. 1923
Brown County Bank v. Hage 156 Minn. 460 Minn. 1923
With that conclusion properly derived from tbe facts by tbe jury, tbe law to be applied is that stated by Mr. Justice Mitchell in Joan-nin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , , 16 L. R. A. 376, 32 Am.
Thomas Peebles & Co. v. Sherman 181 N.W. 715 Minn. 1921
Thomas Peebles & Co. v. Sherman 181 N.W. 715 Minn. 1921
DeGraff v. County of Ramsey, 46 Minn. 319 , ; Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , , 16 L.R.A.
Snyder v. Samuelson 167 N.W. 287 Minn. 1918
Snyder v. Samuelson 167 N.W. 287 Minn. 1918
Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , , 16 L. R. A. 376, 32 Am.
Cox v. Edwards 139 N.W. 1070 Minn. 1913
Cox v. Edwards 139 N.W. 1070 Minn. 1913
76 , and in Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , , 16 L.R.A.
Minneapolis Land Co. v. McMillan 82 N.W. 591 Minn. 1900
Minneapolis Land Co. v. McMillan 82 N.W. 591 Minn. 1900
There was no duress in this case on any of the authorities, and a contention that there was is disposed of by calling attention to Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , ; De Graff v. County of Ramsey, 46 Minn. 319 , ; Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , .
American Baptist Missionary Union v. Hastings 69 N.W. 1078 Minn. 1897
American Baptist Missionary Union v. Hastings 69 N.W. 1078 Minn. 1897
The subject was fully considered by this court in the case of Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , .
Minneapolis Stock-Yards & Packing Co. v. Cunningham 61 N.W. 329 Minn. 1894
Minneapolis Stock-Yards & Packing Co. v. Cunningham 61 N.W. 329 Minn. 1894
Upon the subject of payment under duress or compulsion, see Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , ( .)
Panton v. Duluth Gas & Water Co. 52 N.W. 527 Minn. 1892
Panton v. Duluth Gas & Water Co. 52 N.W. 527 Minn. 1892
What was said upon the law of duress in the recent decision in Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , ( 52 N. W. Rep.