Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bidwell v. Whitney, 4 Minn. 76.
- State ex rel. Klitzke v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 88 61 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1953
- State Ex Rel. Board of Christian Service of Lutheran Minnesota Conference v. School Board of Consolidated School District … 287 N.W. 625 Minn. 1939
- Schieber v. Von Arx 92 N.W. 3 Minn. 1902
- First National Bank of Detroit v. Board of County Commissioners 83 N.W. 468 Minn. 1900
- Fagan v. People's Savings & Loan Ass'n 57 N.W. 142 Minn. 1893
-
Fagan v. People's Savings & Loan Ass'n
57 N.W. 142
Minn. 1893
Belying on a line of decisions commencing with Bidwell v. Whitney, 4 Minn. 76 , and on Dickerson v. Hayes, 26 Minn. 100 , ( ,) it is contended that plaintiff, having, without objection, suffered a sale by foreclosure for the amount claimed in the notice, cannot now recover the alleged surplus; that he should have enjoined the sale.
- Martin v. Lennon 19 Minn. 67 Minn. 1872
-
Martin v. Lennon
19 Minn. 67
Minn. 1872
Bidwell v. Whitney, 4 Minn. 76; Mills v. Kellogg, 7 Minn. 469.
- Conkey v. Dike 17 Minn. 457 Minn. 1871
-
Conkey v. Dike
17 Minn. 457
Minn. 1871
Bidwell vs. Whitney, 4 Minn. 76 .
- Misener v. Gould 11 Minn. 166 Minn. 1866
- Montgomery v. McEwen 9 Minn. 103 Minn. 1864
- Toledo Novelty Works v. Bernheimer 8 Minn. 118 Minn. 1863
- Griswold v. Taylor 8 Minn. 342 Minn. 1863
- Bailey v. Merritt 7 Minn. 159 Minn. 1862
- Nutting v. McCutcheon 5 Minn. 382 Minn. 1861