DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Timmens, 4 Minn. 325.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Douglas Paulson, Appellant Minn. 2025
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Douglas Paulson, Appellant Minn. 2025
    Similarly, in State v. Timmens, 4 Minn. 325 (1860), we held that the fact that the crime occurred on a boat travelling along a portion of the Minnesota River that formed the boundary of Hennepin County was sufficient to establish proper venue in Hennepin County.
  • B. W. & Leo Harris Co. v. City of Hastings 59 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1953
  • B. W. & Leo Harris Co. v. City of Hastings 59 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1953
    See, Olson v. Olson, 203 Minn. 199 , , ; Farmers State Bank v. *50 Cunningham, 182 Minn. 244 , ; Roussain v. Norton, 53 Minn. 560 , ; Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 (422).
  • Flowers v. Germann 1 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1941
  • Flowers v. Germann 1 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1941
    So also in Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325, 331 (422), this court quoted with approval from Willard, Eq.
  • Nellas v. Carline 200 N.W. 602 Minn. 1924
  • Nellas v. Carline 200 N.W. 602 Minn. 1924
    Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 (422); Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 24 (44); New v. Wheaton, 24 Minn. 406 ; Baker v. Thompson, 36 Minn. 314 , ; Groff v. State Bank of Minneapolis, 50 Minn. 234 , , 36 Am.
  • Ludowese v. Amidon 144 N.W. 965 Minn. 1914
  • Ludowese v. Amidon 144 N.W. 965 Minn. 1914
    It is also well settled in this state ever since Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 (422) that “the actual possession of a tenant not only protects him in the enjoyment of his term but is notice of his landlord’s title.” Groff v: Ramsey, 19 Minn. 24 (44); Wilkins v. Bevier, 43 Minn. 213 , , 19 Am.
  • Thompson v. Borg 95 N.W. 896 Minn. 1903
  • Thompson v. Borg 95 N.W. 896 Minn. 1903
    Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 (422); Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 24 (44); Siebert v. Rosser, 24 Minn. 155 ; Wilkins v. Bevier, 43 Minn. 213 , ; Wolf v. Zabel, 44 Minn. 90 , ; Northwestern Land Co. v. Dewey, 58 Minn. 359 , .
  • State v. Lockerby 52 N.W. 958 Minn. 1892
  • State v. Lockerby 52 N.W. 958 Minn. 1892
    9 ; State v. Timmens, 4 Minn. 325 , ( Gil.
  • Wolf v. Zabel 46 N.W. 81 Minn. 1890
  • Wolf v. Zabel 46 N.W. 81 Minn. 1890
    Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 , (422;) Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 24 , (44;) Wilkins v. Bevier, 43 Minn. 213 , ( 45 N. W. Rep.
  • Wilkins v. Bevier 45 N.W. 157 Minn. 1890
  • Wilkins v. Bevier 45 N.W. 157 Minn. 1890
    Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 , (422;) Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 24 , (44.)
  • Marvin v. Dutcher 4 N.W. 685 Minn. 1880
  • Marvin v. Dutcher 4 N.W. 685 Minn. 1880
    Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 (422;) Dixon v. Merritt, 6 Minn. 98 (160;) Davis v. Smith, 7 Minn. 328 (414;) Heinlin v. Fish, 8 Minn. 48 (70;) Sons of Temperance v. Brown, 11 Minn. 254 (356;) Humphrey v. Havens, 12 Minn. 298 ; Johnson v. Wallower, 18 Minn. 288 ; Hinkle v. Lake Superior & Mississippi R. Co., 18 Minn. 297 ; Schwartz v. Germania L
  • Carleton College v. McNaughton 2 N.W. 688 Minn. 1879
  • Carleton College v. McNaughton 2 N.W. 688 Minn. 1879
    Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 (422;) Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 44 ; Palmer v. Bates, 22 Minn. 532 .
  • New v. Wheaton 24 Minn. 406 Minn. 1878
  • New v. Wheaton 24 Minn. 406 Minn. 1878
    This conclusion is, however, supported by Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 , (422;) and Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 44 .
  • Siebert v. Rosser 24 Minn. 155 Minn. 1877
  • Siebert v. Rosser 24 Minn. 155 Minn. 1877
    Morrison v. March, 4 Minn. 325 , (422;) Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 44 .
  • State v. Robinson 14 Minn. 447 Minn. 1869