DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bingham v. Board of Supervisors of Winona County, 8 Minn. 441.

24 citing documents.

  • Limmer v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
  • Rambeck v. La Bree 194 N.W. 643 Minn. 1923
  • Rambeck v. La Bree 194 N.W. 643 Minn. 1923
    Williams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 (496); Tinkcom v. Lewis, 21 Minn. 132, 140 .
  • White v. City of Chatfield 133 N.W. 962 Minn. 1911
  • White v. City of Chatfield 133 N.W. 962 Minn. 1911
    The opinion and the cases therein cited (Williams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 [496], and James v. Wilder, 25 Minn. 305 ) proceed upon the rule that a county cannot purchase or hold property for other than county purposes, and only for the public use of the county.
  • Bartleson v. Munson 117 N.W. 512 Minn. 1908
  • Bartleson v. Munson 117 N.W. 512 Minn. 1908
    Villiams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 (496) ; Tinkcom v. Lewis, 21 Minn. 32, 141 .
  • Lightbody v. Lammers 108 N.W. 846 Minn. 1906
  • Lightbody v. Lammers 108 N.W. 846 Minn. 1906
    Young, J., in Tinkcom v. Lewis, 21 Minn. 132 ; Williams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 (496); Wilson v. Hayes, 40 Minn. 531, 533 , , 4 L. R. A. 196, 12 Am.
  • Thomas v. Hanson 61 N.W. 135 Minn. 1894
  • Thomas v. Hanson 61 N.W. 135 Minn. 1894
    Bingham v. Board Sup’rs, 8 Minn. 441 ( Gil.
  • Shepard v. County of Murray 24 N.W. 291 Minn. 1885
  • Shepard v. County of Murray 24 N.W. 291 Minn. 1885
    James v. Wilder , and Shelley v. Lash, 14 Minn. 373 , (498,) followed Williams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 , (496,) upon the principle of stare decisis, and not upon any approval of the doctrine there announced.
  • Borough of Henderson v. County of Sibley 11 N.W. 91 Minn. 1881
  • Borough of Henderson v. County of Sibley 11 N.W. 91 Minn. 1881
    Such objects are foreign to the purposes for which counties are organized, and, if permitted, would open the door to entanglements and abuses against which the public should be, and is, by law protected, Williams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 , (496;) James v. Wilder, 25 Minn. 305 .
  • Pamperin v. Scanlan 9 N.W. 868 Minn. 1881
  • Pamperin v. Scanlan 9 N.W. 868 Minn. 1881
    People v. Ransom, 4 Denio, 145 ; Williams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 (496;) Tinkcom v. Lewis, 21 Minn. 132 .
  • Willis v. Jelineck 6 N.W. 373 Minn. 1880
  • Willis v. Jelineck 6 N.W. 373 Minn. 1880
    Williams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 (496;) Tinkcom v. Lewis, 21 Minn. 132 .
  • James v. Wilder 25 Minn. 305 Minn. 1878
  • James v. Wilder 25 Minn. 305 Minn. 1878
    In Williams v. Lash, 8 Minn. 441 (496,) it was held that under the statute as it read prior to 1860, it was not competent for a county to purchase and hold real estate, except under the statutory provision found in Pub.
  • Guilder v. Town of Otsego 20 Minn. 74 Minn. 1873
  • Guilder v. Town of Otsego 20 Minn. 74 Minn. 1873
    84; Bingham vs. Board Supervisors Winona County, 8 Minn. 441; Murphy vs. Co. Commissioners Steele County, 14 Minn. 67 ; Raymond vs. Co. Commissioners Stearns County, 18 Minn. 61 .
  • Murphy v. County Commissioners 14 Minn. 67 Minn. 1869