Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bidwell v. Webb, 10 Minn. 59.
- Granse & Associates, Inc. v. Kimm 529 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Granse & Associates, Inc. v. Kimm
529 N.W.2d 6
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Gau v. Hyland (In re Gau), 230 Minn. 235, 240 , ("A lien is in no sense an estate or interest in the land."); Bidwell v. Webb, 10 Minn. 59, 62 , 10 Gil.
- Etzler v. Mondale 123 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1963
-
Etzler v. Mondale
123 N.W.2d 603
Minn. 1963
Paul & Pacific R. Co. 10 Minn. 59 (82); City of Winona v. Huff, 11 Minn. 75 (119).
- Allen v. Village of Savage 112 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1961
-
Allen v. Village of Savage
112 N.W.2d 807
Minn. 1961
P. & P. R. Co. 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
- Headley v. City of Northfield 35 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1949
-
Headley v. City of Northfield
35 N.W.2d 606
Minn. 1949
P. & P. R. Co. (1865) 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- Fitzpatrick v. Berthel 223 N.W. 767 Minn. 1929
-
Fitzpatrick v. Berthel
223 N.W. 767
Minn. 1929
P. & P. R. Co. 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- Barney v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 208 N.W. 821 Minn. 1926
-
Barney v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
208 N.W. 821
Minn. 1926
P. & P. R. Co. 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- State v. Korrer 148 N.W. 617 Minn. 1914
-
State v. Korrer
148 N.W. 617
Minn. 1914
R. Co. 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- Tucker v. Mortenson 148 N.W. 60 Minn. 1914
-
Tucker v. Mortenson
148 N.W. 60
Minn. 1914
R. Co. 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- Burton v. Isaacson 142 N.W. 925 Minn. 1913
-
Burton v. Isaacson
142 N.W. 925
Minn. 1913
R. Co. 10 Minn. 59 (82); Lamprey v. State, supra; Olson v. Thorndike, 76 Minn. 399 , ; Hanson v. Rice, supra; Sherwin v. Bitzer, 97 Minn. 252 , ; Shell v. Matteson, 81 Minn. 38 , ; Scheifert v. Briegel, 90 Minn. 125 , ; a comprehensive review of the subject being found in the case las
- Betcher v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 124 N.W. 1096 Minn. 1910
-
Betcher v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
124 N.W. 1096
Minn. 1910
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
-
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.
107 N.W. 405
Minn. 1906
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- Sherwin v. Bitzer 106 N.W. 1046 Minn. 1906
-
Sherwin v. Bitzer
106 N.W. 1046
Minn. 1906
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82), 88 Am.
- Webber v. Axtell 102 N.W. 915 Minn. 1905
-
Webber v. Axtell
102 N.W. 915
Minn. 1905
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82), wherein it was held that the water, instead of the meander line, must be regarded as the proper boundary of such tract.
- Scheifert v. Briegel 96 N.W. 44 Minn. 1903
-
Scheifert v. Briegel
96 N.W. 44
Minn. 1903
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82); Olson v. Thorndike, 76 Minn. 399 , .
- Hanson v. Rice 92 N.W. 982 Minn. 1903
-
Hanson v. Rice
92 N.W. 982
Minn. 1903
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82), that the owners of lands abutting upon a river or stream are the owners of all land between the meander line and the bed of the stream; that the lines of their tracts extend in a direct course to the thread of the stream.
- Security Land & Exploration Co. v. Burns 91 N.W. 304 Minn. 1902
-
Security Land & Exploration Co. v. Burns
91 N.W. 304
Minn. 1902
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82), which involved simply a, question of riparian rights.
- Olson v. Thorndike 79 N.W. 399 Minn. 1899
-
Olson v. Thorndike
79 N.W. 399
Minn. 1899
Paul & P. R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82), affirmed in Railroad Co. v. Schurmeier, 7 Wall.
- Everson v. City of Waseca 46 N.W. 405 Minn. 1890
-
Everson v. City of Waseca
46 N.W. 405
Minn. 1890
Paul & Pacific R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 , (82;) Railroad Co. v. Schurmeir, 7 Wall.
- Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad 39 N.W. 629 Minn. 1888
-
Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad
39 N.W. 629
Minn. 1888
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 , (82,) ( 88 Am.
- Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co. v. Brunswick 17 N.W. 626 Minn. 1883
-
Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co. v. Brunswick
17 N.W. 626
Minn. 1883
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 , (82;) Brisbine v. St.
- Carli v. Stillwater Street Railway & Transfer Co. 10 N.W. 205 Minn. 1881
-
Carli v. Stillwater Street Railway & Transfer Co.
10 N.W. 205
Minn. 1881
Paul & Pacific R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82;) Winona & St.
- Saint Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 1 N.W. 580 Minn. 1879
-
Saint Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
1 N.W. 580
Minn. 1879
Paul & Pacific R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82,) decided that the meander lines of governmental subdivisions, bordering on navigable, rivers, do not limit the grant in a patent; and this decision was affirmed by the supreme court of the United States in the same case.
- Wilder v. De Cou 1 N.W. 48 Minn. 1879
-
Wilder v. De Cou
1 N.W. 48
Minn. 1879
R. Co., 10 Minn. 59 (82;) City of Winona v. Huff, 11 Minn. 75 (119;) Brisbine v. St.
- Brackett v. Gilmore 15 Minn. 245 Minn. 1870