Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reynolds v. La Crosse & Minnesota Packet Co., 10 Minn. 178.

25 citing documents.

State v. Baker 160 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1968
State v. Baker 160 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1968
As this court observed in State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 at 182 (223 at 230): “* * * ‘[T]he instrument employed must bear a reasonable proportion to the provocation * * [Citations omitted.]
State v. Johnson 152 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1967
State v. Johnson 152 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1967
The Advisory Committee Comment, 40 M. S. A. p. 80, indicates that the statute states the present Minnesota law as expressed in State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 (223), and State v. Tripp, 34 Minn. 25 , .
State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
6 See, State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 (223); State v. Brown, 12 Minn. 448 (538); State v. Wormack, 150 Minn. 249 , ; State v. Miller, 151 Minn. 386 , .
State v. Finn 100 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1960
State v. Finn 100 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1960
See, State v. Gut, 13 Minn. 315 (341); State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 (223).
Devere v. Parten 23 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1946
Devere v. Parten 23 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1946
Rosenberg v. Nelson, 145 Minn. 455 , ; State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 (223), 88 Am.
State v. Towers 118 N.W. 361 Minn. 1908
State v. Towers 118 N.W. 361 Minn. 1908
State v. Smith, 56 Minn. 78 , ; State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 (223), 88 Am.
State v. Prolow 108 N.W. 873 Minn. 1906
State v. Prolow 108 N.W. 873 Minn. 1906
In State v. Brown, 12 Minn. 448 (538), Wilson, C. J., said: “Every homicide is presumed unlawful, and when the mere act of killing is-proven, and nothing more, the presumption is that it was intentional and malicious.” So in State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 (273), 88 Am.
State v. Gardner 104 N.W. 971 Minn. 1905
State v. Gardner 104 N.W. 971 Minn. 1905
In State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 (223), Wilson, C. J., said, inter alia: “It clearly appears that defendant deliberately and intentionally shot the deceased, and from this the presumption is that it was an act of murder.
State v. Hanley 26 N.W. 397 Minn. 1886
State v. Hanley 26 N.W. 397 Minn. 1886
State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 , (223.)
State v. Tripp 24 N.W. 290 Minn. 1885
State v. Tripp 24 N.W. 290 Minn. 1885
State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 , (223;) May, Crim.
State v. Sorenson 19 N.W. 738 Minn. 1884
State v. Sorenson 19 N.W. 738 Minn. 1884
In State v. Shippey, 10 Minn. 178 , (223,) this court said: “Where the party has not retreated from or attempted to shun the combat, but has, as in this case, unnecessarily entered into it, his act is not one of self-defence.” The trial, having been begun before, was proceeded with and closed on, the 22nd day of February, Washington’s birthday.
Brown v. Lawler 21 Minn. 327 Minn. 1875
Skillman v. Greenwood 15 Minn. 102 Minn. 1870
Berthold v. Holman 12 Minn. 335 Minn. 1867