DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kingsley v. Gilman, 15 Minn. 59.

29 citing documents.

  • Eifert v. Hartford Fire Insurance 180 N.W. 996 Minn. 1921
  • Eifert v. Hartford Fire Insurance 180 N.W. 996 Minn. 1921
    Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 (81).
  • McElrath v. McElrath 139 N.W. 708 Minn. 1913
  • Collins v. School District No. 39 131 N.W. 322 Minn. 1911
  • Collins v. School District No. 39 131 N.W. 322 Minn. 1911
    cable rule is stated as follows: “In such a case the question is not whether the complaint would be held good on demurrer; for, where the question of the sufficiency of a pleading is first raised after judgment, it will be sustained if, by any reasonable inference or intendment, a cause of action or defense, as the case may be, can be spelled out of the matters alleged therein.” Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 (81) ; Solomon v. Vinson, 31 Minn. 205 , ; Slater v. Olson, 83 Minn. 35 , ; Peach v. Ree
  • Norton v. Wilkes 101 N.W. 619 Minn. 1904
  • Norton v. Wilkes 101 N.W. 619 Minn. 1904
    McArdle v. McArdle, 12 Minn. 53 (98); Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 (81); Frankoviz v. Smith, 34 Minn. 403 , ; Seibert v. Minneapolis & St.
  • Kubesh v. Hanson 101 N.W. 73 Minn. 1904
  • Kubesh v. Hanson 101 N.W. 73 Minn. 1904
    Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 (81); Solomon v. Vinson, 31 Minn. 205 , ; Slater v. Olson, 83 Minn. 35 , .
  • Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co. 95 N.W. 320 Minn. 1903
  • Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co. 95 N.W. 320 Minn. 1903
    Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 (81); Solomon v. Vinson, 31 Minn. 205 , .
  • Slater v. Olson 85 N.W. 825 Minn. 1901
  • Slater v. Olson 85 N.W. 825 Minn. 1901
    Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 (81); Solomon v. Vinson, 31 Minn. 205 , ; Dorr v. McDonald, 43 Minn. 458 , .
  • Northern Trust Co. v. Markell 63 N.W. 735 Minn. 1895
  • Northern Trust Co. v. Markell 63 N.W. 735 Minn. 1895
    This proposition has not been fully indorsed by this court, for in Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 (81), it was said that, on appeal from a judgment entered in district court on defendant’s default, an objection interposed in this court, for the first time, that the judgment is erroneous because the complaint failed to state a cause of action should not be favored, and that if facts material to support the judgment
  • Sandwich Mfg. Co. v. Zellmer 51 N.W. 379 Minn. 1892
  • Sandwich Mfg. Co. v. Zellmer 51 N.W. 379 Minn. 1892
    Kingsley v. Gilman, 15 Minn. 59 , ( Gil.
  • Bromberg v. Minnesota Fire Ass'n 47 N.W. 975 Minn. 1891
  • Bromberg v. Minnesota Fire Ass'n 47 N.W. 975 Minn. 1891
    See Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 , (81;) Drake v. Barton, 18 Minn. 414 , (462.)
  • Dorr v. McDonald 45 N.W. 864 Minn. 1890
  • Dorr v. McDonald 45 N.W. 864 Minn. 1890
    Within the rule of Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 , (81,) we think that it is fairly inferable by reasonable intendment from what is alleged that, while the original letting was for only a month, the defendant continued in the occupancy of the premises as tenant from month to month.
  • Trebby v. Simmons 38 N.W. 693 Minn. 1888
  • Trebby v. Simmons 38 N.W. 693 Minn. 1888
    Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 , (81;) Solomon v. Vinson, 31 Minn. 205 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.
  • Frankoviz v. Smith 26 N.W. 225 Minn. 1886
  • Frankoviz v. Smith 26 N.W. 225 Minn. 1886
    And if it may be so inferred, then, within the rule for construing a complaint after judgment, applied by this court in various cases, more markedly in Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 , (81,) it is to be taken now as though the fact were distinctly alleged.
  • Solomon v. Vinson 17 N.W. 340 Minn. 1883
  • Solomon v. Vinson 17 N.W. 340 Minn. 1883
    Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 , (81;) Drake v. Barton, 18 Minn. 414 , (462;) Cochrane v. Quackenbush, 29 Minn. 376 ; Hurd v. Simonton, 10 Minn. 340 , (423.)
  • Merrill v. Nelson 18 Minn. 366 Minn. 1872
  • Merrill v. Nelson 18 Minn. 366 Minn. 1872
    Kingsley vs. Gilman, 15 Minn. 59 .