Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carli v. Stillwater & Saint Paul Railroad, 16 Minn. 260.

41 citing documents.

State v. Berry 214 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1974
State v. Berry 214 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1974
State v. Froiseth, 16 Minn. 260 (296) (1871).
State v. Olson 143 N.W.2d 69 Minn. 1966
State v. Olson 143 N.W.2d 69 Minn. 1966
State v. Froiseth, 16 Minn. 260 (296); State v. Gardner, 88 Minn. 130 , .
State v. Rixon 231 N.W. 217 Minn. 1930
State v. Rixon 231 N.W. 217 Minn. 1930
*576 State v. Froiseth, 16 Minn. 260 (296) ; State v. Gardner, 88 Minn. 130 , .
Brooks v. Thorne 222 N.W. 916 Minn. 1929
Shove v. Burkholder Lumber Co. 191 N.W. 397 Minn. 1923
State v. Ernster 179 N.W. 640 Minn. 1920
State v. Ernster 179 N.W. 640 Minn. 1920
State v. Froiseth, 16 Minn. 260 (296); State v. Brecht, 41 Minn. 50 , .
State ex rel. Sandquist v. District Court 175 N.W. 908 Minn. 1919
State ex rel. Sandquist v. District Court 175 N.W. 908 Minn. 1919
State v. Froiseth, 16 Minn. 260 (296); State v. Thaden, 43 Minn. 253 , ; State v. Gardner, 88 Minn. 130 , ; State v. Drew, 110 Minn. 247 , , 136 Am.
State v. Marshall 168 N.W. 174 Minn. 1918
State v. Marshall 168 N.W. 174 Minn. 1918
State v. Froiseth, 16 Minn. 260 (296), and State y. Gardner, 88 Minn. 130 , , holding that where a defendant has been compelled to testify against himself before the grand jury, an indictment based on such testimony will be set aside, are distinguishable.
Radke v. Myers 167 N.W. 360 Minn. 1918
State v. Gardner 92 N.W. 529 Minn. 1902
State v. Gardner 92 N.W. 529 Minn. 1902
State v. Froiseth, 16 Minn. 260 (296); Boyd v. U. S., 116 U. S. 616 , 6 Sup.
Pabst Brewing Co. v. Liston 83 N.W. 448 Minn. 1900
State v. Brecht 42 N.W. 602 Minn. 1889
State v. Brecht 42 N.W. 602 Minn. 1889
That the defendant was required to testify before the grand jury which found the indictment against him is not one of the grounds specified, yet, in State v. Froiseth, 16 Minn. 260 , (296,) it was held that a motion to set aside the indictment, where such was the fact, should be granted.
Hammond v. Peyton 27 N.W. 72 Minn. 1886
Conter v. Saint Paul & Sioux City Railroad 24 Minn. 313 Minn. 1877
Conter v. Saint Paul & Sioux City Railroad 24 Minn. 313 Minn. 1877
P. R. Co. 16 Minn. 260 , and Schermeely v. S. & St.
Trogden v. Winona & St. Peter Railroad 22 Minn. 198 Minn. 1875
Trogden v. Winona & St. Peter Railroad 22 Minn. 198 Minn. 1875
Paul R. Co., 16 Minn. 260 , the person acquiring such interest becomes the proper party to bring the appeal; but the question to be tried on such appeal is the same, whether prosecuted by the original claimant or his grantee.
St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. Murphy 19 Minn. 500 Minn. 1873
St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. Murphy 19 Minn. 500 Minn. 1873
Carli vs. Stillwater, &c., R. R., 16 Minn. 260 .
Colvill v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co. 19 Minn. 283 Minn. 1872
Overruled Colvill v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co. 19 Minn. 283 Minn. 1872
hy this or any other question objected to was incompetent, etc. It simply “ insists that each objection taken by the appellant, to each of the questions put to the witnesses ’ey the respondent on the *287 trial below, which were overruled by the court, and answers allowed,-were well taken, and it was an error for which new trial should have been granted,” and refers to 10 Minn 267; 11 Minn. 515 ; 16 Minn. 260 .
Warren v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 18 Minn. 384 Minn. 1872
Weir v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad 18 Minn. 155 Minn. 1872
Mathews v. St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad 18 Minn. 434 Minn. 1872
Weir v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad 18 Minn. 155 Minn. 1872
Paul R. R. Co., 16 Minn. 260 .
Warren v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 18 Minn. 384 Minn. 1872
P. R. R. Co., 16 Minn. 260 .
Mathews v. St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad 18 Minn. 434 Minn. 1872
Carli vs. Stillwater, &c., R. R., 16 Minn. 260 ; Gray vs. 1st Div. St.
Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad v. Greve 17 Minn. 322 Minn. 1871
Hursh v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 17 Minn. 439 Minn. 1871
Proetz v. St. Paul Water Co. 17 Minn. 163 Minn. 1871
Hursh v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 17 Minn. 439 Minn. 1871
Paul R. R. Co., 16 Minn. 260 , it is held that the land is not taken till award made.
Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad v. Greve 17 Minn. 322 Minn. 1871
Whatever the right and title acquired by the condemnation might be, it would not be acquired till judgment upon the verdict, (Carli vs. Stillwater R. R., 16 Minn. 260 ,) and payment or deposit of the compensation awarded.
Proetz v. St. Paul Water Co. 17 Minn. 163 Minn. 1871
Paul R. R. Co., 16 Minn. 260 ,) that is to say, the sum awarded would be the price of the easement, which, upon payment, the company would acquire in said forty feet strip; i. e. an easement to arise, not a satisfaction for its past unlawful use of the land *169 It does not matter, therefore, whether the referee is right or wrong in his conclusio