Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Leighton v. Grant, 20 Minn. 345.

16 citing documents.

Knapp v. O'BRIEN 179 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1970
Hodson v. Hammer 39 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1949
State v. Haglin 13 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1944
State v. Rea 250 N.W. 41 Minn. 1933
Marble v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 215 N.W. 71 Minn. 1927
County of Hennepin v. Ryberg 210 N.W. 105 Minn. 1926
Nemec v. Brown 184 N.W. 956 Minn. 1921
Larson v. Trageser 184 N.W. 833 Minn. 1921
National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. Scheiber 163 N.W. 781 Minn. 1917
State v. Board of Education 158 N.W. 635 Minn. 1916
State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 103 N.W. 731 Minn. 1905
Drew v. Tifft 81 N.W. 839 Minn. 1900
State Bank v. Heney 41 N.W. 411 Minn. 1889
Griffin v. Chadbourne 19 N.W. 647 Minn. 1884
Torinus v. Buckham 12 N.W. 348 Minn. 1882
Torinus v. Buckham 12 N.W. 348 Minn. 1882
In Leighton v. Grant, 20 Minn. 345 , it was held merely that where there were several promissory notes, and one consideration entering into all of them, not susceptible of apportionment, a partial failure of such consideration could not be set up as a defence to an action upon one of the notes.