Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51.

36 citing documents.

Atwood v. Atwood 91 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1958
Atwood v. Atwood 91 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1958
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
Swanson v. Cross Lake Land Co. 255 N.W. 812 Minn. 1934
Swanson v. Cross Lake Land Co. 255 N.W. 812 Minn. 1934
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
Plankerton v. Continental Casualty Co. 230 N.W. 464 Minn. 1930
Plankerton v. Continental Casualty Co. 230 N.W. 464 Minn. 1930
The case of Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 , is cited and relied on.
Turner v. Even 199 N.W. 751 Minn. 1924
Turner v. Even 199 N.W. 751 Minn. 1924
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
Kenning v. Reichel 182 N.W. 517 Minn. 1921
Kenning v. Reichel 182 N.W. 517 Minn. 1921
The rule applied to the amendment of judgments.in ordinary actions is that there must be notice to the adverse party, Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 , and to any other person whose title to property will be affected by the entry of the proposed judgment.
National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. Silver 164 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1917
National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. Silver 164 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1917
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
Foster v. Brick 141 N.W. 101 Minn. 1913
Foster v. Brick 141 N.W. 101 Minn. 1913
245; Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
Katz v. Hlavac 92 N.W. 506 Minn. 1902
Katz v. Hlavac 92 N.W. 506 Minn. 1902
G. S. 1894, § 5420; Kates v. Thomas, 14 Minn. 343 (460); Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 ; Sherman v. Clark, 24 Minn. 37 .
Phelps v. Heaton 82 N.W. 990 Minn. 1900
Phelps v. Heaton 82 N.W. 990 Minn. 1900
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
Aldrich v. Chase 73 N.W. 161 Minn. 1897
Aldrich v. Chase 73 N.W. 161 Minn. 1897
See Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 ; Welch v. Marks, supra; Chase v. Whitten, 62 Minn. 498 .
New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. Bryant 66 N.W. 974 Minn. 1896
New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. Bryant 66 N.W. 974 Minn. 1896
G. S. 1894, § 5420; Kates v. Thomas, 14 Minn. 343 (460); Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 ; Sherman v. Clark, 24 Minn. 37 ; French v. Ginsburg, 57 Minn. 264 , .
Suchaneck v. Smith 54 N.W. 932 Minn. 1893
Suchaneck v. Smith 54 N.W. 932 Minn. 1893
315 ; and see Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51, 55 ; D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Wilson, 37 Minn. 8, 9 , (32 N. W. Rep.
West v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co. 41 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1889
West v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co. 41 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1889
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
Schoregge v. Gordon 13 N.W. 194 Minn. 1882
Schoregge v. Gordon 13 N.W. 194 Minn. 1882
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 ; Gemmell v. Rice, 13 Minn. 400 .
Knox v. Randall 24 Minn. 479 Minn. 1878
Knox v. Randall 24 Minn. 479 Minn. 1878
Anthony Falls Water Power Co. 9 Minn. 44 , (55;) Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
State ex rel. Brown v. Macdonald 24 Minn. 48 Minn. 1877
Sherman v. Clark 24 Minn. 37 Minn. 1877
State ex rel. Brown v. Macdonald 24 Minn. 48 Minn. 1877
This was entirely competent, as remarked in Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 : “The district court, as a superior court with general jurisdiction, has full power, by the common law and by statute, to amend its records by correcting the clerical errors and misprisions of its clerk.
Sherman v. Clark 24 Minn. 37 Minn. 1877
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .
Sheldon v. Risedorph 23 Minn. 518 Minn. 1877
Sheldon v. Risedorph 23 Minn. 518 Minn. 1877
Berthold v. Fox, 21 Minn. 51 .