Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101.

45 citing documents.

Cargill, Inc. v. Hedge 358 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cargill, Inc. v. Hedge 358 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
When a creditor attempts to foreclose a vendee’s interest in his homestead, “an equitable owner of land * * * may properly claim and hold the same as a homestead.” Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101, 107 (1874).
M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. Mormann 271 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1978
M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. Mormann 271 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1978
itions of any contract for the conveyance of real estate or any interest therein, whereby the vendor has a right to terminate the same, he may do so by serving upon the purchaser, his personal representatives or assigns, either within or without the state, a notice specifying the conditions in which default has been made, and stating that such contract will terminate * * 3 .See Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 (1874) (vendee of a contract to purchase land is treated in equity as equitable owner o
Denzer v. Prendergast 126 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1964
Denzer v. Prendergast 126 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1964
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 , cited in the Kaser case, declares only that one occupying under a contract for deed is entitled to the exemption.
Rusch v. Lagerman 261 N.W. 186 Minn. 1935
Rusch v. Lagerman 261 N.W. 186 Minn. 1935
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; Reynolds v. Fleming, 43 Minn. 513 , .
Summers v. Midland Co. 209 N.W. 323 Minn. 1926
Summers v. Midland Co. 209 N.W. 323 Minn. 1926
Sons of Temperance v. Brown, 9 Minn. 144 (157); Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; Woodward v. McCollum, infra.
Blanchard v. Hoffman 192 N.W. 352 Minn. 1923
Blanchard v. Hoffman 192 N.W. 352 Minn. 1923
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 .
Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; Hook v. Northwest T. Co. 91 Minn. 482 , .
Krelwitz v. McDonald 161 N.W. 156 Minn. 1917
Werntz v. Bolen 161 N.W. 155 Minn. 1917
Krelwitz v. McDonald 161 N.W. 156 Minn. 1917
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101, 106 ; State v. Red River Lumber Co. 109 Minn. 185 , .
Werntz v. Bolen 161 N.W. 155 Minn. 1917
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 .
Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 144 N.W. 222 Minn. 1913
Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 144 N.W. 222 Minn. 1913
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; Minneapolis & St.
State v. Red River Lumber Co. 123 N.W. 412 Minn. 1909
State v. Red River Lumber Co. 123 N.W. 412 Minn. 1909
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; McKinney v. Bode, 32 Minn. 228 , ; Haaven v. Hoaas, 60 Minn. 313 , .
White & Street Townsite Co. v. J. Neils Lumber Co. 110 N.W. 371 Minn. 1907
White & Street Townsite Co. v. J. Neils Lumber Co. 110 N.W. 371 Minn. 1907
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; McKinney v. Bode, 32 Minn. 228 , ; Haaven v. Hoaas, 60 Minn. 313, 316 , ; Plastay v. Bonness, 84 Minn. 120 , ; Gilbert v. McDonald, 94 Minn. 289 , ; Nicholson v. Congdon, 95 Minn. 188 , .
Hook v. Northwest Thresher Co. 98 N.W. 463 Minn. 1904
Hook v. Northwest Thresher Co. 98 N.W. 463 Minn. 1904
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 .
Keith v. Albrecht 94 N.W. 677 Minn. 1903
Keith v. Albrecht 94 N.W. 677 Minn. 1903
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; Kaser v. Haas, 27 Minn. 406 , ; In re Emerson’s Homestead, 58 Minn. 450 , .
Haaven v. Hoaas 62 N.W. 110 Minn. 1895
Haaven v. Hoaas 62 N.W. 110 Minn. 1895
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; McKinney v. Bode, 32 Minn. 228 , .
In re Emerson's Homestead 60 N.W. 23 Minn. 1894
In re Emerson's Homestead 60 N.W. 23 Minn. 1894
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 .
Law v. Butler 47 N.W. 53 Minn. 1890
Law v. Butler 47 N.W. 53 Minn. 1890
In Wilder v. Haughen, 21 Minn. 101 , it was decided that an equitable owner of land (and such was Dean) may claim and hold the same as a homestead.
Reynolds v. Fleming 45 N.W. 1099 Minn. 1890
Jelinek v. Stepan 43 N.W. 90 Minn. 1889
Jelinek v. Stepan 43 N.W. 90 Minn. 1889
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 ; Hartman v. Munch, Id.
Holbrook v. Wightman 17 N.W. 280 Minn. 1883
Holbrook v. Wightman 17 N.W. 280 Minn. 1883
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 .
Kaser v. Haas 7 N.W. 824 Minn. 1881
Kaser v. Haas 7 N.W. 824 Minn. 1881
So in Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 , an equitable owner — one occupying under a contract for purchase merely — was held entitled to the exemption.
Ferguson v. Kumler 6 N.W. 618 Minn. 1880
Ferguson v. Kumler 6 N.W. 618 Minn. 1880
Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 .
Smith v. Lackor 23 Minn. 454 Minn. 1877
Smith v. Lackor 23 Minn. 454 Minn. 1877
Cornell, J. As respects defendant’s homestead claim, and the assignment of his interest without the consent and signature of his wife, it is difficult in principle to distinguish the case at bar from Wilder v. Haughey, 21 Minn. 101 , and *457 Hartman v. Munch, 21 Minn. 107 .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by