Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202.

27 citing documents.

Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield 143 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1966
Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield 143 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1966
Being of such character it is valid.” See, also, City of Duluth v. Cerveny, 218 Minn. 511 , 16 N. W. (2d) 779 ; State v. Weeks, 216 Minn. 279 , 12 N. W. (2d) 493 ; State v. Houston, 210 Minn. 379 , ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , ; State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 .
Cleveland v. County of Rice 56 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1952
Cleveland v. County of Rice 56 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1952
[5] State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 (open on Sunday); City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , 87 N.W.
State v. Weeks 12 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1943
State v. Weeks 12 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1943
State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , .” State v. Collins, 107 Minn. 500 , .
Power v. Nordstrom 184 N.W. 967 Minn. 1921
Power v. Nordstrom 184 N.W. 967 Minn. 1921
The legislature, in the exercise of police power, may prohibit all manner of labor and business on Sundays, except works of necessity or charity, and may delegate authority to municipal corporations to enact ordinances with like prohibitions: State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 .
City of Virginia v. Erickson 168 N.W. 821 Minn. 1918
City of Virginia v. Erickson 168 N.W. 821 Minn. 1918
State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; State v. Lee, 29 Minn. 445 , ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , ; State v. Lindquist, 77 Minn. 540 , ; City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , 87 N, W. 915; State v. Marciniak, 97 Minn. 355 , ; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
State v. Marciniak 105 N.W. 965 Minn. 1906
Followed State v. Marciniak 105 N.W. 965 Minn. 1906
State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , ; State v. Lindquist, 77 Minn. 540 , ; City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , .
City of Jordan v. Nicolin 87 N.W. 915 Minn. 1901
City of Jordan v. Nicolin 87 N.W. 915 Minn. 1901
State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , .
State v. Barge 84 N.W. 911 Minn. 1901
State v. Barge 84 N.W. 911 Minn. 1901
Paul v. Troyer, 3 Minn. 200 (291); State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; In re Wilson, 32 Minn. 145 , .
State v. Lindquist 80 N.W. 701 Minn. 1899
State v. Lindquist 80 N.W. 701 Minn. 1899
State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; State v. Lee, 29 Minn. 445 , .
State v. Petit 77 N.W. 225 Minn. 1898
State v. Petit 77 N.W. 225 Minn. 1898
State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 .
State v. Harris 52 N.W. 387 Minn. 1892
State v. Harris 52 N.W. 387 Minn. 1892
Such is the effect of the decisions of this court in State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; State v. Lee, 29 Minn. 445 , ( 13 N. W. Rep.
State ex rel. Erickson v. West 43 N.W. 845 Minn. 1889
State ex rel. Erickson v. West 43 N.W. 845 Minn. 1889
This was in accordance with what had been intimated in State v. Charles, 16 Minn. 426 , (474,) and State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 , and with the views expressed by Justice Cornell in State v. Oleson, 26 Minn. 507, 512 , (5 N. W. Rep, 959.)
State v. Lee 13 N.W. 913 Minn. 1882
State v. Lee 13 N.W. 913 Minn. 1882
Though this last proposition was not directly decided in State v. Charles, 16 Minn. 474 , and State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 , yet we think the Opinion in each case contains a clear intimation in support of the doctrine.
State v. Oleson 5 N.W. 959 Minn. 1880