Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299.

33 citing documents.

Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Haggerty 448 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1989
In Re Haggerty 448 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1989
The court later confirmed the first legislature enacted the homestead statute “in obedience to an express mandate of the constitution, art. 1, § 12.” Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299, 302 (1875).
Marr v. Bradley 59 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1953
Marr v. Bradley 59 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1953
*509 In Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 , the property involved ceased to he a homestead after the execution of the.contract to sell had been signed by the husband but not by the wife.
Rux v. Adam 172 N.W. 912 Minn. 1919
Rux v. Adam 172 N.W. 912 Minn. 1919
G. S. 1913, § 6961; Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 .
Brokl v. Brokl 158 N.W. 250 Minn. 1916
Brokl v. Brokl 158 N.W. 250 Minn. 1916
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 .
Delisha v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester & Dubuque Electric Traction Co. 126 N.W. 276 Minn. 1910
Delisha v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester & Dubuque Electric Traction Co. 126 N.W. 276 Minn. 1910
Paul, S. & T. F. R. Co., 22 Minn. 286 ; Barton v. Drake, *521 21 Minn. 299 ; Conway v. Elgin, 38 Minn. 469 , ; Law v. Butler, 44 Minn. 482 , , 9 L.R.A.
Lucy v. Lucy 120 N.W. 754 Minn. 1909
Lucy v. Lucy 120 N.W. 754 Minn. 1909
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 , is entirely consistent with this conclusion.
Murphy v. Renner 109 N.W. 593 Minn. 1906
Murphy v. Renner 109 N.W. 593 Minn. 1906
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 ; Conway v. Elgin, 38 Minn. 469 , ; Law v. Butler, 44 Minn. 482 , , 9 L. R. A. 856; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
In re How 61 N.W. 456 Minn. 1894
In re How 61 N.W. 456 Minn. 1894
354 ); Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 .
Weitzner v. Thingstad 56 N.W. 817 Minn. 1893
Weitzner v. Thingstad 56 N.W. 817 Minn. 1893
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 ; Law v. Butler, 44 Minn. 482 , ( 47 N. W. Rep.
Law v. Butler 47 N.W. 53 Minn. 1890
Law v. Butler 47 N.W. 53 Minn. 1890
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 , decided that this applies as well to a contract to convey as to a conveyance.
Jelinek v. Stepan 43 N.W. 90 Minn. 1889
Jelinek v. Stepan 43 N.W. 90 Minn. 1889
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 ; Smith v. Lackor, 23 Minn. 454 ; Ferguson v. Kumler, 25 Minn. 183 .
Alt v. Banholzer 40 N.W. 830 Minn. 1888
Alt v. Banholzer 40 N.W. 830 Minn. 1888
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 .
Conway v. Elgin 38 Minn. 469 Minn. 1888
Conway v. Elgin 38 Minn. 469 Minn. 1888
Burton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 .
Gaston v. Merriam 22 N.W. 614 Minn. 1885
Gaston v. Merriam 22 N.W. 614 Minn. 1885
Morisse v. Royal British Bank, 1 C. B. (N. S.) 67; Town of Maple Lake v. County of Wright, 12 Minn. 287 , (403;) Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 ; Moss v. City of St.
Gilman v. Van Brunt 13 N.W. 125 Minn. 1882
Gilman v. Van Brunt 13 N.W. 125 Minn. 1882
Paul, 5 Minn. 70 , (95); Scribner v. Allen, 12 Minn. 148 ; Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 ; Conkey v. Dike, 17 Minn. 457 ; Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 ; More v. Card, 14 Mis.
Wilson v. Proctor 8 N.W. 830 Minn. 1881
Wilson v. Proctor 8 N.W. 830 Minn. 1881
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 ; Ferguson v. Kumler, 25 Minn. 183 ; Thompson on Homesteads and Exemptions, § 231.