DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435.

28 citing documents.

  • Amos Graves v. Michael Wayman, First Minnesota Bank 859 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 2015
  • Blumberg v. Taggart 5 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1942
  • Blumberg v. Taggart 5 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1942
    1927, § 8089: “No implied or resulting trust shall be alleged or established to defeat or prejudice the title of a purchaser for a valuable consideration, and without notice of such trust.” The following cases, amongst others, uphold the rule: Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435, 438 ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255, 257 , ; Newton v. Newton, 46 Minn. 33, 37 , ; 18 Minn. *44 L. Rev. 366; 25 Minn. L. Rev. 674 , 689; United States v. Dunn, 268 U. S. 121, 132 , 45 S. Ct. 451 , 69 L. ed. 876; 4 Boge
  • Gustafson v. Equitable Loan Assn. 243 N.W. 106 Minn. 1932
  • Gustafson v. Equitable Loan Assn. 243 N.W. 106 Minn. 1932
    Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 ; National Bank of Commerce v. C. B. & N. R. Co. 44 Minn. 224 , , 9 L. R. A. 263, 20 A. S. R. 566; Globe Milling Co. v. Minneapolis Elev.
  • Sandercock v. Evarts 218 N.W. 464 Minn. 1928
  • Sandercock v. Evarts 218 N.W. 464 Minn. 1928
    ld find “that at some time after maturity” the note was transferred by in-dorsement to the plaintiff, who “took said note with full knowledge of the facts thereof, and with notice of any defenses.” The court having found that the Sandercocks wilfully falsified as to the transfer before maturity, could also conclude there was no transfer for value so as to bring the case within Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 .
  • Hayes v. Midland Credit Co. 218 N.W. 106 Minn. 1928
  • Hayes v. Midland Credit Co. 218 N.W. 106 Minn. 1928
    Nor can defendant, largely for the same reasons, have relief under Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 , which has little application where the note was not delivered by plaintiff to Henkel.
  • Crosby v. Paine 211 N.W. 947 Minn. 1927
  • Crosby v. Paine 211 N.W. 947 Minn. 1927
    Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 ; Griffin v. Bristle, 39 Minn. 456 , ; Carlson v. Schoch, 141 Minn. 236 , ; Mann v. Lamb, 83 Minn. 14 , ; Nieter v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co. 159 Minn. 395 , ; 38 Cyc.
  • Cardozo v. Fawcett 196 N.W. 809 Minn. 1924
  • Cardozo v. Fawcett 196 N.W. 809 Minn. 1924
    Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 ; Schumacher v. Greene Cananea Copper Co. 117 Minn. 124 , , 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 180, Ann. Cas.
  • McWethy v. Norby 173 N.W. 803 Minn. 1919
  • McWethy v. Norby 173 N.W. 803 Minn. 1919
    Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 .
  • Norris v. Boston Music Co. 151 N.W. 971 Minn. 1915
  • Norris v. Boston Music Co. 151 N.W. 971 Minn. 1915
    Defendant contends that being a good faith purchaser it acquired a valid title as against plaintiffs, and in support of this contention cites Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 , and other cases which hold that, if a vendee whose title is voidable for fraud sells the property to a good faith purchaser, the purchaser acquires a valid title.
  • Mlnazek v. Libera 86 N.W. 100 Minn. 1901
  • Mlnazek v. Libera 86 N.W. 100 Minn. 1901
    Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435, 439 ; 14 Am.
  • Brown v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States 78 N.W. 103 Minn. 1899
  • Cochran v. Stewart 59 N.W. 543 Minn. 1894
  • Cochran v. Stewart 59 N.W. 543 Minn. 1894
  • Newton v. Newton 48 N.W. 450 Minn. 1891
  • Newton v. Newton 48 N.W. 450 Minn. 1891
    Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 .
  • MacLaren v. Cochran 46 N.W. 408 Minn. 1890
  • MacLaren v. Cochran 46 N.W. 408 Minn. 1890
    Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 .
  • Globe Milling Co. v. Minneapolis Elevator Co. 46 N.W. 306 Minn. 1890
  • Globe Milling Co. v. Minneapolis Elevator Co. 46 N.W. 306 Minn. 1890
    Plaintiff claims that the case comes within the rule laid down in Cochran v. Stewart, 21 Minn. 435 , that in case of the sale and delivery by the owner of personal property, although he may have been induced to make such sale and delivery by fraudulent acts and representations of the vendee, the latter may convey a good title to a *156 bona fide pui-chaser, — a rule founded on the proposition that, of two persons