Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Getchell v. Hill, 21 Minn. 464.
- State v. Lautenschlager 22 Minn. 514 Minn. 1876
-
State v. Lautenschlager
22 Minn. 514
Minn. 1876
In effect, therefore, the enquiry was predicated upon the hypothesis that the facts stated by the testimony referred to, and which the witness heard, were true, and was a convenient mode of stating a hypothetical case, permissible in the discretion of the court, within the rule laid down in Getchell v. Hill, 21 Minn. 464 .