DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15.

30 citing documents.

  • State v. Casey 115 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1962
  • State v. Casey 115 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1962
    244 Minn. 81, 92 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673, 683 , where we stated: “Although evidence in mitigation of damages is generally admissible in a personal injury suit, no arbitrary rule of evidence can be formulated which is applicable to all situations and much must be left to the sound discretion of the trial court.” 4 In Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15, 16 , we stated: “To give any evidence of value, when on the rebuttal, rested not upon a right in the plaintiffs, but in the discretion of the court; and if
  • Cantieny v. Boze 296 N.W. 491 Minn. 1941
  • Cantieny v. Boze 296 N.W. 491 Minn. 1941
    Co. 152 Minn. 128, 136 , , where it was said, “there can be no estoppel as to facts equally known to both parties,” citing Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 .
  • Makiesky v. National Guardian Life Insurance 219 N.W. 864 Minn. 1928
  • Makiesky v. National Guardian Life Insurance 219 N.W. 864 Minn. 1928
    21 C. J. 1131, § 132(3); Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Pence v. Arbuckle, 22 Minn. 417 ; Shillock v. Gilbert, 23 Minn. 386 ; James v. Wilder, 25 Minn. 305 ; Western Land Assn. v. Banks, 80 Minn. 317 , ; Cornish, Curtis & Greene Co. v. Antrim Co-op.
  • Jandrich v. Svabek 211 N.W. 957 Minn. 1927
  • Jandrich v. Svabek 211 N.W. 957 Minn. 1927
    Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348, 349 , .
  • Darelius v. Commonwealth Mortgage Co. 188 N.W. 208 Minn. 1922
  • Darelius v. Commonwealth Mortgage Co. 188 N.W. 208 Minn. 1922
    Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 .
  • Canellos v. Zotalis 177 N.W. 133 Minn. 1920
  • Canellos v. Zotalis 177 N.W. 133 Minn. 1920
    Hawley v. Wilkinson, 18 Minn. 468 (525); Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Hause v. Hause, 29 Minn. 252 , ; Davis v. Severance, 49 Minn. 528 , .
  • Lufkin v. Harvey 147 N.W. 444 Minn. 1914
  • Lufkin v. Harvey 147 N.W. 444 Minn. 1914
    Hewitt v. Brown, 21 Minn. 163 ; Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Ingle v. Angell, 111 Minn. 63 , , 137 Am.
  • Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 145 N.W. 124 Minn. 1914
  • Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 145 N.W. 124 Minn. 1914
    Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , .
  • Ingle v. Angell 126 N.W. 400 Minn. 1910
  • Ingle v. Angell 126 N.W. 400 Minn. 1910
    Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 .
  • Thompson v. Borg 95 N.W. 896 Minn. 1903
  • Thompson v. Borg 95 N.W. 896 Minn. 1903
    Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Western Land Assn. v. Banks, 80 Minn. 317 , .
  • Cornish, Curtis & Greene Co. v. Antrim Co-operative Dairy Ass'n 84 N.W. 724 Minn. 1901
  • Cornish, Curtis & Greene Co. v. Antrim Co-operative Dairy Ass'n 84 N.W. 724 Minn. 1901
    Under similar conditions, it has been held by this court “that there can be no estoppel as to facts when they are equally known to both parties.” Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 .
  • Western Land Ass'n v. Banks 83 N.W. 192 Minn. 1900
  • Western Land Ass'n v. Banks 83 N.W. 192 Minn. 1900
    Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Combs v. Cooper, 5 Minn. 200 (254); Shillock v. Gilbert, 23 Minn. 386 ; Bigelow, Estop.
  • Rhodes v. Pray 32 N.W. 86 Minn. 1887
  • Rhodes v. Pray 32 N.W. 86 Minn. 1887
    Hawley v. Wilkinson, 18 Minn. 468 , (525;) Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.
  • Wagner v. Nagel 23 N.W. 308 Minn. 1885
  • Wagner v. Nagel 23 N.W. 308 Minn. 1885
    Hawley v. Wilkinson, 18 Minn. 468 , (525;) Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 .
  • James v. Wilder 25 Minn. 305 Minn. 1878
  • James v. Wilder 25 Minn. 305 Minn. 1878
    ought to speak out, intentionally, or through culpable negligence, induces another to' believe certain facts to exist, and such other rightfully acts on the belief so induced, in such manner that if the former be permitted to deny the existence of such facts, it will prejudice the latter.” See also Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Shillock v. Gilbert, 23 Minn. 386 .