Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. New, 22 Minn. 76.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Douglas Paulson, Appellant Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Douglas Paulson, Appellant Minn. 2025
n.4 (Minn. 2023) ( (concluding that evidence was sufficient to establish venue); (concluding that the State had proven venue beyond a reasonable doubt); State v. New, 22 Minn. 76, 78–79 (1875) (noting that the defendant argued for a jury instruction that included a “beyond a reasonable doubt” burden for venue and concluding that the State proved venue)).
State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson, A21-1360, Supreme Court, September 13, 2023 Minn. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson, A21-1360, Supreme Court, September 13, 2023 Minn. 2023
(concluding that the State had proven venue beyond a reasonable doubt); (concluding that evidence was sufficient to establish venue); State v. New, 22 Minn. 76, 78–79 (Minn. 1875) (noting that the defendant argued for a jury instruction that included a “beyond a reasonable doubt” burden for venue and concluding that the State proved venue).
State v. Heiges 806 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
State v. Heiges 806 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
Our interpretation of the term “confession” in this case is consistent with our interpretation of the term “confession” in the context of similar statutes that use the term “confession.” See State v. New, 22 Minn. 76, 3 (1875) (holding that the defendant’s confession to an agent of the defrauded company required corroboration); 2 State v. Laliyer, 4 Minn. 368, 6-7 , ( Gil.
State v. Azzone 135 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1965
State v. Azzone 135 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1965
See, State v. Laliyer, 4 Minn. 277 (368); State v. New, 22 Minn. 76 .
State v. Heidelberg 12 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1944
State v. Heidelberg 12 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1944
In State v. New, 22 Minn. 76 , there was no evidence that the money was taken out of Hennepin county or that unlawful appropriation was made in any other place.
State v. Wylie 186 N.W. 707 Minn. 1922
State v. Wylie 186 N.W. 707 Minn. 1922
16 C. J. 736; section 8462, G. S. 1913; State v. Laliyer, 4 Minn. 277 (368); State v. New, 22 Minn. 76 ; State v. Grear, 29 Minn. 221 , ; State v. McLarne, 128 Minn. 163 , .
State ex rel. Elms v. Brown 183 N.W. 669 Minn. 1921
State ex rel. Elms v. Brown 183 N.W. 669 Minn. 1921
rst degree.” In disposing of the case upon appeal in this court it was said: “The only rational general rule that can be adopted by which to measure its sufficiency, is, does it show clearly, and without any doubt, the intention of the jury and their finding on the issues presented to them P If it does, it cannot be declared bad without sacrificing substance and justice to form.” In State v. New, 22 Minn. 76 , the verdict was: “The jury in this case find the defendant, Thomas New, guilty.
State v. Dufour 143 N.W. 1126 Minn. 1913
State v. Dufour 143 N.W. 1126 Minn. 1913
Law, *224; State v. New, 22 Minn. 76; State v. Gerber, 111 Minn. 132 , ; Commonwealth v. Briggs, 11 Met.
State v. Murphy 129 N.W. 850 Minn. 1911
State v. Murphy 129 N.W. 850 Minn. 1911
State v. New, 22 Minn. 76, 78 ; State v. Comings, 54 Minn. 359 , ; Com.
State ex rel. Rinne v. Gerber 126 N.W. 482 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Rinne v. Gerber 126 N.W. 482 Minn. 1910
State v. New, 22 Minn. 76 ; 22 Cyc.
State v. Holmes 68 N.W. 11 Minn. 1896
State v. Holmes 68 N.W. 11 Minn. 1896
While the reasons for the decision are left rather obscure, yet this was all that was decided in State v. New, 22 Minn. 76 , for in that case the indictment was good, and the evidence introduced admissible under it, irrespective of the provisions of section 7262, It is also worthy of notice that in People v. Donald, supra, Justice Cooley takes pains to state that the evidence in that case would not support the information as a common-law
State v. Comings 56 N.W. 50 Minn. 1893
State v. Masteller 47 N.W. 541 Minn. 1890
State v. Masteller 47 N.W. 541 Minn. 1890
1878, c. 108, § 7; State v. New, 22 Minn. 76 ; State v. Lavake, 26 Minn. 526 , ( 6 N. W. Rep.
State v. Butler 1 N.W. 821 Minn. 1879
State v. Butler 1 N.W. 821 Minn. 1879
State v. New, 22 Minn. 76 .