cl-8008372
Precedential
Dismissed
Processed
Carpenter v. Comfort
Cited by
- State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District Court 185 N.W. 1019 Minn. 1921
- Winegar v. Martin 182 N.W. 513 Minn. 1921
- Antonsky v. City Dye House 123 N.W. 56 Minn. 1909
- Taylor v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. 107 N.W. 545 Minn. 1906
- State ex rel. Jones v. District Court 99 N.W. 806 Minn. 1904
- State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District Court 79 N.W. 960 Minn. 1899
- Allis v. White 60 N.W. 809 Minn. 1894
- Schoch v. Winona & St. Peter Railroad 57 N.W. 208 Minn. 1893
- Hinds v. Backus 47 N.W. 655 Minn. 1891
Opinion text
Gilfillan, C. J. This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial. Such an order does not involve the merits of the action, or any part thereof, under Gen. St. ch. 86, § 8. If reviewable at all, it must *540 be upon an appeal from tbe judgment, (or perhaps from an ■order denying a new trial,) as an order affecting the judgment. Appeal dismissed. 1 The rule in this case was followed in Benton v. Flynn, decided April 26, 1876. Macdonald 4 Southworth, for appellants; Benton 4 Benton, for respondent.