Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51.

31 citing documents.

Sherman v. Bureau of Catholic Charities 63 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1954
Sherman v. Bureau of Catholic Charities 63 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1954
Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court 283 N.W. 545 Minn. 1938
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court 283 N.W. 545 Minn. 1938
As long ago as Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 , this court held that the word “estates” appearing in the constitutional grant “is used only with reference to deceased persons, so that the proper reading of the constitutional provision is that a probate court shall have jurisdiction over the estates of deceased persons, and over persons under guardianship, etc. Th
State Ex Rel. Minnesota National Bank v. District Court Fourth Judicial District 262 N.W. 155 Minn. 1935
State Ex Rel. Minnesota National Bank v. District Court Fourth Judicial District 262 N.W. 155 Minn. 1935
“The former obtained jurisdiction before the latter and, under a familiar principle, retained it, with the right to proceed to final determination without interference by the latter.” See also Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 .
Winjum v. Jesten 253 N.W. 881 Minn. 1934
Winjum v. Jesten 253 N.W. 881 Minn. 1934
Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; Huntsman v. Fish, 36 Minn. 148 , ; Lyngen v. Tessum, 169 Minn. 304 ; 2 Mason Minn. St.
Snicker v. Byers 224 N.W. 152 Minn. 1929
Snicker v. Byers 224 N.W. 152 Minn. 1929
Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; State ex rel.
Baune v. Maryland Casualty Co. 210 N.W. 396 Minn. 1926
Baune v. Maryland Casualty Co. 210 N.W. 396 Minn. 1926
257 , ; Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51, 54 ; Freick v. Hinkly, 122 Minn. 24, 27 , , 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 695.
Boling v. Dickinson 210 N.W. 875 Minn. 1926
Boling v. Dickinson 210 N.W. 875 Minn. 1926
See Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; Betcher v. Betcher, 83 Minn. 215 , ; Pierce v. Maetzold, 126 Minn. 445 , ; Fischer v. Hintz, 145 Minn. 161 , ; Wilson v. Erickson, 147 Minn. 260 , .
Wilson v. Erickson 188 N.W. 994 Minn. 1922
Wilson v. Erickson 188 N.W. 994 Minn. 1922
Levi v. Longini, 82 Minn. 324 , , ; Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; Cox v. Manvel, 56 Minn. 358 , ; Wilson v. Erickson, 147 Minn. 260 , .
Curtis v. Hutchinson 148 N.W. 66 Minn. 1914
Curtis v. Hutchinson 148 N.W. 66 Minn. 1914
Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 .
Brown v. Strom 129 N.W. 136 Minn. 1910
Brown v. Strom 129 N.W. 136 Minn. 1910
See Cone v. Hooper, 18 Minn. 476 (531); Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Wiswell v. Wiswell, 35 Minn. 371 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Reiser v. Gigrich, 59 Minn. 368 , ; Boltz v.Schutz, 61 Minn. 444 , ; Stark
Kelly v. Kelly 74 N.W. 899 Minn. 1898
Kelly v. Kelly 74 N.W. 899 Minn. 1898
Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 .
Foreman v. Board of County Commissioners 67 N.W. 207 Minn. 1896
Foreman v. Board of County Commissioners 67 N.W. 207 Minn. 1896
Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; State v. Wilcox, 24 Minn. 143 .
McNamara v. Casserly 63 N.W. 880 Minn. 1895
McNamara v. Casserly 63 N.W. 880 Minn. 1895
Wood v. Myrick, and Greenwood v. Murray, supra; Montour v. Purdy, 11 Minn. 278 (384); Babcock v. Cobb, 11 Minn. 247 (347); Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; Hartley v. Croze, 38 Minn. 325 , ; Gary, Prob.
Huntsman v. Fish 30 N.W. 455 Minn. 1886
Huntsman v. Fish 30 N.W. 455 Minn. 1886
Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 .
Davis v. Hudson 11 N.W. 136 Minn. 1881
State ex rel. Chesley v. Wilcox 24 Minn. 143 Minn. 1877
State ex rel. Chesley v. Wilcox 24 Minn. 143 Minn. 1877
” This clause came under consideration *148 in Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 , and it was held to invest the probate court with general jurisdiction of the subject of guardianship, and to give power as well to put persons under guardianship as to control that relation after it is created.