Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brisbine v. St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad, 23 Minn. 114.

43 citing documents.

Ryan Carlson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., 23 Minn. 114, 129- 130 (1876) (determining that riparian rights appurtenant to a strip of property belonged to the fee owner of the property and thus the city did not hold exclusive riparian rights, only a street easement bordering the river); McLafferty, d at 167 (applying Brisbine to conclude that the city did not ha
McLafferty v. St. Aubin 500 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McLafferty v. St. Aubin 500 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Paul & Sioux City R.R., 23 Minn. 114 (1876), the supreme court determined that the riparian rights appurtenant to a strip of property extending from the middle of a dedicated street easement to the shore of the Mississippi belonged to the fee owner of the property.
State v. Slotness 185 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1971
State v. Slotness 185 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1971
Petraborg v. Zontelli 15 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1944
Petraborg v. Zontelli 15 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1944
P. & S. C. R. Co. 23 Minn. 114 ; Union Depot, St.
Lamprey v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. 266 N.W. 434 Minn. 1936
Lamprey v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. 266 N.W. 434 Minn. 1936
P. & S. C. R. Co. 23 Minn. 114 , relied on by plaintiffs, is not similar as to the facts.
Troska v. Brecht 167 N.W. 1042 Minn. 1918
Troska v. Brecht 167 N.W. 1042 Minn. 1918
Paul & S. C. R. Co. 23 Minn. 114 ; Hanford v. St.
State v. Korrer 148 N.W. 617 Minn. 1914
State v. Korrer 148 N.W. 617 Minn. 1914
Paul & Sioux City R. Co. 23 Minn. 114, 130 .
Fish v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 147 N.W. 431 Minn. 1914
Fish v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 147 N.W. 431 Minn. 1914
Paul & Sioux City R. Co. 23 Minn. 114, 129 , where the following language was used in course of discussion of riparian rights: “What these rights are, especially in regard to land acquired originally from the United States, and bordering, as this does, upon the Mississippi river, we regard as fully and correctly settled by the Federal Supreme Court.
Eyre v. City of Faribault 141 N.W. 170 Minn. 1913
Eyre v. City of Faribault 141 N.W. 170 Minn. 1913
Paul & S. C. R. Co. 23 Minn. 114, 128 , under a statute making no provision for notice of the application to condemn, that “whenever * * * either by an indefinite statement in the petition as to the interest of the claimant in the property, or by one not accepted by him as true before the commissioners, it becomes necessary for them to inquire into a
Betcher v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 124 N.W. 1096 Minn. 1910
Betcher v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 124 N.W. 1096 Minn. 1910
Paul & S. C. R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 ; Wait v. May, 48 Minn. 453 , .
Reeves v. Backus-Brooks Co. 86 N.W. 337 Minn. 1901
Reeves v. Backus-Brooks Co. 86 N.W. 337 Minn. 1901
Paul & S. C. R. Co., 23 Minn. 114, 130 , thus: A riparian owner has “The right to enjoy free communication between his abutting premises and the navigable channel of the river; to build and maintain, for his own and the public use, suitable landing-places, wharves, and piers, on and in front of his land; and to extend the same therefrom into the river
Bradshaw v. Duluth Imperial Mill Co. 53 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1892
Bradshaw v. Duluth Imperial Mill Co. 53 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1892
Paul & Sioux City R. Co. 23 Minn. 114 ; Union Depot, etc., Co. v. Brunswick, 31 Minn. 297 ,( 17 N. W. Rep.
Wait v. May 51 N.W. 471 Minn. 1892
Wait v. May 51 N.W. 471 Minn. 1892
Paul & S. C. R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 , and the federal authority therein relied on, Banks v. Ogden, 2 Wall.
Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 42 N.W. 596 Minn. 1889
Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 42 N.W. 596 Minn. 1889
Paul & Sioux City R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 , differs from this in the particular just mentioned.
Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad 39 N.W. 629 Minn. 1888
Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad 39 N.W. 629 Minn. 1888
Paul *289 & Sioux City R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 ; Union Depot, etc., Co. v. Brunswick, 31 Minn. 297 , ( 17 N W. Rep.
Lake Superior Land Co. v. Emerson 38 N.W. 200 Minn. 1888
Lake Superior Land Co. v. Emerson 38 N.W. 200 Minn. 1888
Paul & Sioux City R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 ; Union De *408 pot, etc., Co. v. Brunswick, 81 Minn. 297, ( 17 N. W. Rep.
In re Robbins 24 N.W. 356 Minn. 1885
In re Robbins 24 N.W. 356 Minn. 1885
Paul & S. C. R. Co., 23 Minn. 114, 130 .
Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co. v. Brunswick 17 N.W. 626 Minn. 1883
Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co. v. Brunswick 17 N.W. 626 Minn. 1883
Paul & Sioux City R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 .
Carli v. Stillwater Street Railway & Transfer Co. 10 N.W. 205 Minn. 1881
Carli v. Stillwater Street Railway & Transfer Co. 10 N.W. 205 Minn. 1881
Paul & Sioux City R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 .
Morrill v. Saint Anthony Falls Water-Power Co. 2 N.W. 842 Minn. 1879
Morrill v. Saint Anthony Falls Water-Power Co. 2 N.W. 842 Minn. 1879
Paul & Sioux City R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 .
Greve v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 1 N.W. 816 Minn. 1879
Greve v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 1 N.W. 816 Minn. 1879
Paul & Sioux City R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 , Brisbine was a riparian owner on the Mississippi river.
Wilder v. De Cou 1 N.W. 48 Minn. 1879
Wilder v. De Cou 1 N.W. 48 Minn. 1879
Paul & Sioux City R. Co., 23 Minn. 114 , the lot carries with it the fee of the street on which it lies, to the centre line thereof,) and all the rights and privileges of every kind which he possessed in such lots and intervening portions of streets.