cl-8008476
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
State v. Miller
Cited by
- State v. Shannon 51 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1952
- State v. Swan 186 N.W. 581 Minn. 1922
- State v. Wyman 43 N.W. 1116 Minn. 1889
- State v. Johnson 21 N.W. 843 Minn. 1884
Opinion text
Cornell, J. The question sought to be presented and argued by defendant is not properly before us for consideration. The return to the appeal contains no exceptions taken to “any opinion, direction, or judgment” of the court below, and settled, allowed, and made a part of the judgment roll, as prescribed by Gen. St. c. 117, § 6. Hence, the only question which can be considered upon the record before us is as to the sufficiency of the indictment to support the judgment. As appellant- makes no question of this character, and none is apparent to the court, the judgment is affirmed.