Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463.

40 citing documents.

Cook v. Connolly 353 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cook v. Connolly 353 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463, 467 (1877); Buechner v. Columbia Shoe Co., 60 Minn. 477 , 62 N.W.
State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; State v. Quirk, 101 Minn. 334 , ; State v. Phillips, 105 Minn. 375 , ; 20 Dunnell, *348 Dig.
Briggs v. Kennedy Mayonnaise Products, Inc. 297 N.W. 342 Minn. 1941
Briggs v. Kennedy Mayonnaise Products, Inc. 297 N.W. 342 Minn. 1941
See Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; Pomeroy, Code Remedies (5 ed.) § 396, note 8.
State v. Gandel 217 N.W. 120 Minn. 1928
State v. Gandel 217 N.W. 120 Minn. 1928
22 R. C. L. p. 1213; State v. Shettleworth, 18 Minn. 191 (208); Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; State v. Reid, 39 Minn. 277 , ; State v. Alton, 105 Minn. 410 , , 15 Ann. Cas.
State v. Taylor 175 N.W. 615 Minn. 1920
State v. Taylor 175 N.W. 615 Minn. 1920
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; State v. Quirk, 101 Minn. 334 , ; State v. Phillips, 105 Minn. 375 , ; 3 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Nickolay v. Orr 172 N.W. 222 Minn. 1919
Nickolay v. Orr 172 N.W. 222 Minn. 1919
f made complaint to her husband and others to whom she might be expected to make complaint, within such time as would under the circumstances be reasonable, is important for your consideration in determining whether or not her story is true.” Considering that evidence upon this phase of the case inadmissible and to be treated the same as if the charge were criminal, as held in Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 , we think the instruction proper.
Gracz v. Anderson 116 N.W. 1116 Minn. 1908
Gracz v. Anderson 116 N.W. 1116 Minn. 1908
§ 770; Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; Malone v. Stephenson, 94 Minn. 222 , .
Picciano v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. 112 N.W. 885 Minn. 1907
Picciano v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. 112 N.W. 885 Minn. 1907
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; Buechner v. Columbia Shoe Co., 60 Minn. 477 , ; Lathrop v. Schutte, 61 Minn. 196 , ; Hess v. Adamant Mnfg.
Johnson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 112 N.W. 534 Minn. 1907
Johnson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 112 N.W. 534 Minn. 1907
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; Buechner v. Columbia Shoe Co., 60 Minn. 477 , .
State v. Quirk 112 N.W. 409 Minn. 1907
State v. Quirk 112 N.W. 409 Minn. 1907
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; Alward v. Oakes, 63 Minn. 190 , ; Malone v. Stephenson, 94 Minn. 222 , .
Malone v. Stephenson 102 N.W. 372 Minn. 1905
Malone v. Stephenson 102 N.W. 372 Minn. 1905
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; Alward v. Oakes, 63 Minn. 190 , .
Nyman v. Lynde 101 N.W. 163 Minn. 1904
Nyman v. Lynde 101 N.W. 163 Minn. 1904
Following Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 , this form of action brought by the father of a minor child so assaulted will lie.
Davis v. Hamilton 88 N.W. 744 Minn. 1902
Davis v. Hamilton 88 N.W. 744 Minn. 1902
Densmore v. Shepard, 46 Minn. 54 , ; Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; Christal v. Craig, 80 Mo.
Hess v. Adamant Manufacturing Co. of America 68 N.W. 774 Minn. 1896
Hess v. Adamant Manufacturing Co. of America 68 N.W. 774 Minn. 1896
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; Buchner v. Columbia Shoe Co., 60 Minn. 477 , ; Lathrop v. Schutte, 61 Minn. 196 , .
Matthews v. Hershey Lumber Co. 67 N.W. 1008 Minn. 1896
Matthews v. Hershey Lumber Co. 67 N.W. 1008 Minn. 1896
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 .
Bamka v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railroad 63 N.W. 1116 Minn. 1895
Bamka v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railroad 63 N.W. 1116 Minn. 1895
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 .
Lathrop v. Schutte 63 N.W. 493 Minn. 1895
Lathrop v. Schutte 63 N.W. 493 Minn. 1895
Such action is expressly authorized by G. S. 1894, § 5164, as construed by this court in Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 , which was followed at the present term in Buechner v. Columbia Shoe Co., 60 Minn. 477 , .
Buechner v. Columbia Shoe Co. 62 N.W. 817 Minn. 1895
Buechner v. Columbia Shoe Co. 62 N.W. 817 Minn. 1895
In Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 , the point was made that the father, in an action in his own name, could not recover damages sustained by his minor child by reason of injuries caused by the wrong-.
Schmit v. Mitchell 61 N.W. 140 Minn. 1894
Schmit v. Mitchell 61 N.W. 140 Minn. 1894
A father, or in case of his death, or desertion of his family, the mother, may maintain an action for the injury of the child, and the guardian for the injury of the ward.” This court, in Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 , interpreted “child” in section 34 as meaning a “minor child,” and it is contended by appellant’s counsel that “daughter” in section 33 means the same thing as “child” in section 34, and that, as plaintiff’s daughter was not a minor, he cannot maintain this action.
State v. Bagan 43 N.W. 5 Minn. 1889
State v. Bagan 43 N.W. 5 Minn. 1889
Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463 ; State v. Wagner, Id.