Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lamberton v. Merchants' National Bank, 24 Minn. 281.

31 citing documents.

Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A. 842 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A. 842 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
at 985 -86 (citing Lamberton v. Merchants’ Nat’l Bank of Winona, 24 Minn. 281, 282 (1877)).
Burke v. Burke 297 N.W. 340 Minn. 1941
In Re Application of Juran 226 N.W. 201 Minn. 1929
In Re Application of Juran 226 N.W. 201 Minn. 1929
Bank, 24 Minn. 281 ; Wilcox v. Leominster Nat.
Scott v. Marquette National Bank 217 N.W. 136 Minn. 1927
Scott v. Marquette National Bank 217 N.W. 136 Minn. 1927
Bank, 24 Minn. 281 ; Lebanon Sav.
Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
Bank of Winona, 24 Minn. 281 ; Wilcox v. Leominster Nat.
Oxborough v. St. Martin 170 N.W. 707 Minn. 1919
Oxborough v. St. Martin 170 N.W. 707 Minn. 1919
Bank of Winona, 24 Minn. 281 ; Dyer v. Thorstad, 35 Minn. 534 , ; Baker v. Thompson, 36 Minn. 314 , ; Wilkins v. Bevier, 43 Minn. 213 , , 19 Am.
Webb v. Downes 101 N.W. 966 Minn. 1904
Webb v. Downes 101 N.W. 966 Minn. 1904
Bank of Winona, 24 Minn. 281 ; Willard v. Finnegan, 42 Minn. 476 , .
Clark v. Kraker 53 N.W. 706 Minn. 1892
Clark v. Kraker 53 N.W. 706 Minn. 1892
Bank, 24 Minn. 281 , established the rule for this state that execution sales in gross, as one parcel of lands consisting of separate tracts, are not void because of such noncompliance with the statutory direction, but only voidable for cause shown.
Groff v. State Bank of Minneapolis 52 N.W. 651 Minn. 1892
Groff v. State Bank of Minneapolis 52 N.W. 651 Minn. 1892
Bank of Winona, 24 Minn. 281 .
Wilcox v. Leominster National Bank 45 N.W. 1136 Minn. 1890
Wilcox v. Leominster National Bank 45 N.W. 1136 Minn. 1890
Bank, 24 Minn. 281 ; Dutton v. McReynolds, 31 Minn. 66, ( 16 N. W. Rep.
Wilkins v. Bevier 45 N.W. 157 Minn. 1890
Wilkins v. Bevier 45 N.W. 157 Minn. 1890
Bank, 24 Minn. 281, 287 .
Duford v. Lewis 44 N.W. 522 Minn. 1890
Duford v. Lewis 44 N.W. 522 Minn. 1890
Bank, 24 Minn. 281 , it was held that the statute (Gen.
Willard v. Finnegan 44 N.W. 985 Minn. 1890
Willard v. Finnegan 44 N.W. 985 Minn. 1890
Bank, 24 Minn. 281 , in which this court -held that a sale on execution in gross, as one parcel, of several distinct and separate tracts of land not lying in a body, is not void, but might be vacated for cause shown, as that it was the result of actual fraud, or that prejudice resulted to the owner from it, or that there was no just gro
Baker v. Thompson 31 N.W. 51 Minn. 1887
Baker v. Thompson 31 N.W. 51 Minn. 1887
Bank, 24 Minn. 281, 287 ; New v. Wheaton, Id.
Dyer v. Thorstad 29 N.W. 345 Minn. 1886
Dyer v. Thorstad 29 N.W. 345 Minn. 1886
Bank, 24 Minn. 281 , and cases cited; Allen v. McCalla, 25 Iowa, 464 , and cases cited; Gooding v. Riley, 50 N. H. 400, and cases cited.
Butman v. James 27 N.W. 66 Minn. 1886
Butman v. James 27 N.W. 66 Minn. 1886