Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517.

27 citing documents.

Nicholas W. Sterry, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 (1877)).
Joan M. Nichols v. State of Minnesota, Office of the Secretary of State Minn. 2015
Nichols v. State 858 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 2015
Nichols v. State 858 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 2015
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517, 574 (1877) (“The exemption of the state from actions by its citizens is not based on any constitutional provision, but merely on grounds of public policy....
Joan M. Nichols v. State of Minnesota, Office of the Secretary of State Minn. 2015
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517, 574 (1877) (“The exemption of the state from actions by its citizens is not based on any constitutional provision, but merely on grounds of public policy.
Nichols v. State, Office of the Secretary 842 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nichols v. State, Office of the Secretary 842 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517, 574-75 (1877), cited in Lund v. Commissioner of Pub.
Lund v. Commissioner of Public Safety 783 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2010
Lund v. Commissioner of Public Safety 783 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2010
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517, 574-75 (1877); Act of April 28, 1941, ch. 492, § 27, 1941 Minn. Laws 907 , 914 (codified at Minn.Stat.
Nieting v. Blondell 235 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1975
Nieting v. Blondell 235 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1975
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 (1877).
State Ex Rel. Birkeland v. Christianson 229 N.W. 313 Minn. 1930
State Ex Rel. Birkeland v. Christianson 229 N.W. 313 Minn. 1930
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 ; Western R. Co. v. DeGraff, 27 Minn. 1 , ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Burnquist v. District Court Second Judicial District 168 N.W. 634 Minn. 1918
State ex rel. Burnquist v. District Court Second Judicial District 168 N.W. 634 Minn. 1918
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 ; Western R. Co. v. DeGraff, 27 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Whitcomb, 28 Minn. 50 , ; State v. Braden, 40 Minn. 174 , , wherein the exception suggested in Chamberlain v. Sibley, 4 Minn. 228 (309) was disapproved.
Smith v. Smith 144 N.W. 138 Minn. 1913
Smith v. Smith 144 N.W. 138 Minn. 1913
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517, 575 ; Minnesota Debenture Co. v. Johnson, 94 Minn. 150 , , 110 Am.
State ex rel. Kinsella v. Eberhart 133 N.W. 857 Minn. 1911
State ex rel. Kinsella v. Eberhart 133 N.W. 857 Minn. 1911
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 , was based on the same general principle, and the court held that the duties sought to be enforced were duties belonging to the Govern- or as an executive, and that the court had no jurisdiction over him.
Berman v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society 100 N.W. 732 Minn. 1904
Berman v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society 100 N.W. 732 Minn. 1904
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 ; Western R. Co. v. De Graff, 27 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Whitcomb, 28 Minn. 50 , .
State ex rel. Hahn v. Young 9 N.W. 737 Minn. 1881
State ex rel. Hahn v. Young 9 N.W. 737 Minn. 1881
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 .
State ex rel. Thompson v. Whitcomb 8 N.W. 902 Minn. 1881
State ex rel. Thompson v. Whitcomb 8 N.W. 902 Minn. 1881
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 ; Western Railroad Co. v. De Graff, 27 Minn. 1 .
Western Railroad v. De Graff 6 N.W. 341 Minn. 1880
Western Railroad v. De Graff 6 N.W. 341 Minn. 1880
Co. v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517, 573, 574 .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by