Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baldwin v. Canfield, 1 N.W. 261.

53 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Donald Floyd Deeble, Jr. v. Hayley Elizabeth Espelien, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Donald Floyd Deeble, Jr. v. Hayley Elizabeth Espelien, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See, (noting 9 that corporate assets belong to the corporation, not its shareholders); (“Stockholders do not have an ‘interest’ in the corporate real estate, in the sense in which the word ‘interest’ is commonly used in that connection, for such real estate is the property of the corporation.”).
In re the Marriage of: Sneha Singh, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that “[c]orporate assets do not belong to the stockholders, but to the corporation”) (quotation omitted); see also Baldwin v. Canfield , (stating that “[s]tockholders [of a corporation] do not have an ‘interest’ in the corporate real estate, in the sense in which the word ‘interest’ is commonly used in that connection, for such real estate is the property of the corporation”).
Rehn v. Fischley 557 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1997
Rehn v. Fischley 557 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1997
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , 1 N.W.
Wenzel v. Mathies 542 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Wenzel v. Mathies 542 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43, 56 , 1 N.W.
Wilson v. Spilman 352 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wilson v. Spilman 352 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43, 59 , 1 N.W.
Clarke v. Bennett 284 N.W. 876 Minn. 1939
In Re Trust Under Will of Clarke 284 N.W. 876 Minn. 1939
In Re Trust Under Will of Clarke 284 N.W. 876 Minn. 1939
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , 1 N.W.
Clarke v. Bennett 284 N.W. 876 Minn. 1939
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , .
Dennistoun v. Davis 229 N.W. 353 Minn. 1930
Dennistoun v. Davis 229 N.W. 353 Minn. 1930
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ; Lund v. Wheaton R. M. Co. 50 Minn. 36 , , 36 A. S. R. 623; U. S. & C. Land Co. v. Sullivan, 113 Minn. 27 , , Ann. Cas.
Brown County Bank v. Freie Presse Printing Co. 218 N.W. 557 Minn. 1928
Brown County Bank v. Freie Presse Printing Co. 218 N.W. 557 Minn. 1928
Allen v. American B. & L. Assn. 49 Minn. 544 , , 32 A. S. R. 574; Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ; Segal v. Davis, 166 Minn. 265 , ; Kremer v. Public Drug Co. 41 S. D. 365, ; Forrester v. Boston & Mont.
State Ex Rel. Shenango Furnace Co. v. Armson 215 N.W. 74 Minn. 1927
State Ex Rel. Shenango Furnace Co. v. Armson 215 N.W. 74 Minn. 1927
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ; State v. C. & N. W. Ry.
Mortgage Land Investment Co. v. McMains 215 N.W. 192 Minn. 1927
Mortgage Land Investment Co. v. McMains 215 N.W. 192 Minn. 1927
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ; Joslyn v. St.
Congdon v. Congdon 200 N.W. 76 Minn. 1924
Congdon v. Congdon 200 N.W. 76 Minn. 1924
Corp. p. 5615, § 3429; 14 C. J. 387; Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , *374 .
Benson v. Saffert-Gugisberg Cement Construction Co. 198 N.W. 297 Minn. 1924
Benson v. Saffert-Gugisberg Cement Construction Co. 198 N.W. 297 Minn. 1924
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ; Lund v. Wheaton Roller Mill Co. 50 Minn. 36 , , 36 Am.
Pink v. Metropolitan Milk Co. 152 N.W. 725 Minn. 1915
Pink v. Metropolitan Milk Co. 152 N.W. 725 Minn. 1915
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ; Cannon River Manufacturers’ Assn. v. Rogers, 51 Minn. 388 , ; Clearwater County State Bank v. Bagley-Ogema Tel.
Erickson v. Revere Elevator Co. 126 N.W. 130 Minn. 1910
Erickson v. Revere Elevator Co. 126 N.W. 130 Minn. 1910
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , .
Slingerland v. Slingerland 124 N.W. 19 Minn. 1910
Slingerland v. Slingerland 124 N.W. 19 Minn. 1910
Maloney v. Finnegan, 38 Minn. 70 , ; Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , .
Shaw v. Staight 119 N.W. 951 Minn. 1909
Shaw v. Staight 119 N.W. 951 Minn. 1909
326; Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ; 3 Pomeroy, Eq.
Prince Investment Co. v. St. Paul & Sioux City Land Co. 70 N.W. 1079 Minn. 1897
Prince Investment Co. v. St. Paul & Sioux City Land Co. 70 N.W. 1079 Minn. 1897
“Except as against the corporation, the owner and holder of shares of stock may, as an incident of his right of property, transfer the same as any other personal property of which he is the owner.” Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , .
Stewart v. Great Northern Railway Co. 68 N.W. 208 Minn. 1896
Stewart v. Great Northern Railway Co. 68 N.W. 208 Minn. 1896
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , 585 .
Basting v. Northern Trust Co. 63 N.W. 721 Minn. 1895
Basting v. Northern Trust Co. 63 N.W. 721 Minn. 1895
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , .
Lund v. Wheaton Roller Mill Co. 52 N.W. 268 Minn. 1892
Lund v. Wheaton Roller Mill Co. 52 N.W. 268 Minn. 1892
As early as May, 1879, in the case of Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ( 1 N. W. Rep.
Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co. 48 N.W. 1124 Minn. 1891
Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co. 48 N.W. 1124 Minn. 1891
The right of a stockholder to take means to preserve the corporate property, to prevent its loss to the corporation, or the impairment of its value, was distinctly recognized in Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ( 1 N. W. Rep.
Joslyn v. St. Paul Distilling Co. 46 N.W. 337 Minn. 1890
Joslyn v. St. Paul Distilling Co. 46 N.W. 337 Minn. 1890
In Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ( 1 N. W. Rep.
Maloney v. Finnegan 35 N.W. 723 Minn. 1887
Nicollet National Bank v. City Bank 35 N.W. 577 Minn. 1887
Maloney v. Finnegan 35 N.W. 723 Minn. 1887
Paul, 5 Minn. 70 , (95;) Scribner v. Allen, 12 Minn. 85 , (148;) Conkey v. Dike, 17 Minn. 434 , (457, 463;) Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ( 1 N. W. Rep.
Nicollet National Bank v. City Bank 35 N.W. 577 Minn. 1887
Baldwin v. Canfield, 26 Minn. 43 , ( 1 N. W. Rep.
Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. v. Prince 24 N.W. 361 Minn. 1885