Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mims, 2 N.W. 494.

28 citing documents.

State v. Larson 605 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2000
State v. Larson 605 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2000
975 (1897) (register of deeds); State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , 2 N.W.
State v. Taylor 133 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1965
State v. Taylor 133 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1965
8 See, State v. Armstrong, 257 Minn. 295 , 101 N. W. (2d) 398 ; State v. Rosenswieg, 168 Minn. 459 , ; State v. Pearson, 153 Minn. 32 , ; State v. Rue, 72 Minn. 296 , ; State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , .
State v. Prickett 21 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1946
State v. Prickett 21 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1946
State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183, 190 , , 494; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Flaherty 197 N.W. 284 Minn. 1924
State v. Flaherty 197 N.W. 284 Minn. 1924
State v. Wims, 26 Minn. 183 , , 683; Hurlburt v. Leachman, 126 Minn. 180 , .
Robyn v. White 189 N.W. 577 Minn. 1922
Robyn v. White 189 N.W. 577 Minn. 1922
State v. Stokely, 16 Minn. 249 (282); State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , , 683; State v. Lentz, 45 Minn. 177 , .
State v. Atanosoff 164 N.W. 1011 Minn. 1917
459 ; State v. Cox, 26 Minn. 214 , .
Hurlburt v. Leachman 148 N.W. 51 Minn. 1914
Hurlburt v. Leachman 148 N.W. 51 Minn. 1914
236 ; State v. Stokely, 16 Minn. 249 (282); State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , , 683; Bradt v. Rommel, 26 Minn. 505 , ; Stevens v. Montgomery, 27 Minn. 108 , ; State v. Lentz, 45 Minn. 177 , ; Wester v. Hedberg, 68 Minn. 434 , ; Rush v. St.
State v. Ronk 98 N.W. 334 Minn. 1904
State v. Cox, 26 Minn. 214 , ; State v. MacDonald, 30 Minn. 98 , ; Sherman v. St.
State v. Evans 92 N.W. 976 Minn. 1903
State v. Evans 92 N.W. 976 Minn. 1903
In State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , , 683, it was held in a criminal case, as it had previously been held in a civil action, that the decision of a trial court upon the question of the actual bias of a challenged juror was a finality, and that it could not be reviewed, although brought to this court through a properly taken exception.
State v. Feldman 83 N.W. 182 Minn. 1900
State v. Feldman 83 N.W. 182 Minn. 1900
State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , , 683.
State v. Durnam 75 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1898
State v. Durnam 75 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1898
State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , , 683.
Hawkins v. Manston 59 N.W. 309 Minn. 1894
Hawkins v. Manston 59 N.W. 309 Minn. 1894
224 ), in a civil action, and State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , ( , 683,) in a criminal action.
State v. Lentz 47 N.W. 720 Minn. 1891
State v. Lentz 47 N.W. 720 Minn. 1891
Martin v. Desnoyer, 1 Minn. 131 , (156;) Knowlton v. McMahon, 13 Minn. 358 , (386;) State v. Stokely, 16 Minn. 249 , (282;) State v. Beebe, 17 Minn. 218 , (241;) State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 , ( 2 N. W. Rep.
Bingham v. Bernard 30 N.W. 404 Minn. 1886
Bingham v. Bernard 30 N.W. 404 Minn. 1886
§ 1127, and cases cited; State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183, 186-7 , ( 2 N. W. Rep.
State v. Ring 11 N.W. 233 Minn. 1882
State v. Ring 11 N.W. 233 Minn. 1882
The statement was proper evidence to be presented to the jury, (State v. Mims, 26 Minn. 183 ,) and they might properly construe it to have been intended to represent cents in the two right-hand figures, and dollars in those standing at the left of the line.