cl-8008847 Precedential Dismissed Processed

Croft v. Miller

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed December 30, 1879 · 4 N.W. 45

Cited by

Fulton v. Okes 262 N.W. 570 Minn. 1935
McClearn v. Arnold 217 N.W. 106 Minn. 1927
Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth 121 N.W. 212 Minn. 1909
Krafve v. Roy 107 N.W. 966 Minn. 1906
Cummings v. Edwards-Wood Co. 103 N.W. 709 Minn. 1905
Duxbury v. Shanahan 87 N.W. 944 Minn. 1901
St. Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham 69 N.W. 1077 Minn. 1897
United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Ahrens 52 N.W. 898 Minn. 1892
McConnell v. Rakness 42 N.W. 539 Minn. 1889

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Lamb v. McCanna 14 Minn. 513
Rogers v. Holyoke 14 Minn. 514
Searles v. Thompson 18 Minn. 316
Ryan v. Kranz 25 Minn. 362
Langdon v. Thompson 25 Minn. 509

Opinion text

Berry, J. This is, in effect, an appeal from an order of the district court for Nobles county, for judgment against a- garnishee. Gen. St. 1878, e. 66, § 197, enacts that any party to a garnishment proceeding, deeming himself aggrieved by any order or final judgment therein, may remove the same from a district court-to the supreme court, by appeal, in the same cases, in like manner, and with like effect as in a civil action. That no appeal lies from an order for judgment in a civil action has been settled by several decisions of this court. Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 513 ; Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 514 ; Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 316 ; Ryan v. *318 Kranz, 25 Minn. 362 ; Langdon v. Thompson, 25 Minn. 509 ; Chesterson v. Munson, ante, p. 303. Though the point of non-appealability is not made by counsel, we cannot overlook it, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.