Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McClure v. City of Red Wing, 9 N.W. 767.

33 citing documents.

Hunt v. Estate of Hanson 356 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hunt v. Estate of Hanson 356 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, e.g., McClure v. The City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , 9 N.W.
Collins v. Wickland 88 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1958
Collins v. Wickland 88 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1958
2 Compare illustrations 3 and 4 of Restatement, Torts, § 841; see McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , , where the court found it unnecessary to determine the nature of a waterflow along a ravine in an area of high bluffs.
Johnson v. County of Steele 60 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1953
Johnson v. County of Steele 60 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1953
586 ; McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , 9 N.W.
Paul v. Faricy 37 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1949
Paul v. Faricy 37 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1949
See, McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , ; City of Chicago v. Seben, 165 Ill.
Roche v. City of Minneapolis 27 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1947
Roche v. City of Minneapolis 27 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1947
Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , , 1 A. S. R. 671; McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , ; Taubert v. City of St.
Greenwood v. Evergreen Mines Co. 19 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1945
Greenwood v. Evergreen Mines Co. 19 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1945
Mr. Justice Mitchell, in McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186, 192 , , stated the rule in this language: “* * * On principle, we believe that, so far as the circumstances of the case and public necessity will permit, the same rules should be applied to such corporations [municipalities], in the management and improvement of their streets, as would be applied to
City of Globe v. Shute 196 P. 1024 Ariz. 1921
Newman v. County of St. Louis 176 N.W. 191 Minn. 1920
Newman v. County of St. Louis 176 N.W. 191 Minn. 1920
This is in accord with the principles stated in Kobs v. City of Minneapolis, 22 Minn. 159, 164 , and McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186, 193 , .
Batcher v. City of Staples 139 N.W. 140 Minn. 1912
Batcher v. City of Staples 139 N.W. 140 Minn. 1912
And the complaint may also be sustained on the theory that it shows an invasion of plaintiff’s property rights, within the principle of McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , , Tate v. City of St.
Kroeger v. Twin Buttes Railroad 114 P. 553 Ariz. 1911
Nye v. Kahlow 107 N.W. 733 Minn. 1906
Fossum v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 82 N.W. 979 Minn. 1900
Fossum v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 82 N.W. 979 Minn. 1900
In this respect this case cannot be distinguished from McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , .
Taubert v. City of St. Paul 71 N.W. 664 Minn. 1897
Taubert v. City of St. Paul 71 N.W. 664 Minn. 1897
The request was in nearly the identical language used by this court as sound law in the case of McClure v. City, 28 Minn. 186 , , and it was error in the court not to have given it.
Sheehan v. Flynn 61 N.W. 462 Minn. 1894
Sheehan v. Flynn 61 N.W. 462 Minn. 1894
On account of the topography of that country, a *448 slight depression may constitute a very important natural drain for surface water, and the unreasonable or unnecessary diversion of the water from the same would bring the case within the principle of the case of McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , ( .)
St. Paul & Duluth Railroad v. City of Duluth 58 N.W. 159 Minn. 1894
St. Paul & Duluth Railroad v. City of Duluth 58 N.W. 159 Minn. 1894
“The duty of providing drainage or sewerage is in its nature judicial or legislative, and consequently a municipal corporation is not liable for mere nonaction *501 in failing to perform it.” McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 194 , ( .)
Rowe v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 43 N.W. 76 Minn. 1889
Rowe v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 43 N.W. 76 Minn. 1889
McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186, 193 , ( 9 N. W. Rep.
Pye v. City of Mankato 31 N.W. 863 Minn. 1887
Pye v. City of Mankato 31 N.W. 863 Minn. 1887
272 ;) McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , ( 9 N. W. Rep.
City of Minneapolis v. Wilkin 14 N.W. 581 Minn. 1883
City of Minneapolis v. Wilkin 14 N.W. 581 Minn. 1883
McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 ; Cooley on Const. Lim.