DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pamperin v. Scanlan, 9 N.W. 868.

34 citing documents.

  • Eagan Economic Development Authority v. U-Haul Co. of Minnesota 787 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 2010
  • Eagan Economic Development Authority v. U-Haul Co. of Minnesota 787 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 2010
    See Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345, 347 , 9 N.W.
  • First National Bank of Glencoe/Minnetonka v. Pletsch 543 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • First National Bank of Glencoe/Minnetonka v. Pletsch 543 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    668 (1882); Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , 9 N.W.
  • In Re the Brainerd National Bank 383 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1986
  • In Re the Brainerd National Bank 383 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1986
    668 (1882); Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , 9 N.W.
  • Thelen V. Brainerd National Bank 360 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1984
  • Thelen V. Brainerd National Bank 360 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1984
    He wrote: [I] am satisfied that the doctrine laid down in [Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , 9 N.W.
  • Graybow-Daniels Co. v. Pinotti 255 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1977
  • Graybow-Daniels Co. v. Pinotti 255 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1977
    Our prior decisions under this statute favor the position taken by Graybow Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , 9 N.W.
  • FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN WINNEBAGO v. Boler 190 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1971
  • FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN WINNEBAGO v. Boler 190 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1971
    Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , .
  • Lowe v. Reierson 276 N.W. 224 Minn. 1937
  • Lowe v. Reierson 276 N.W. 224 Minn. 1937
    Of particular value here is Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345, 348, 349 , , where Mr. Justice Mitchell lucidly covers the field with respect to redemptions and the order in Avhich lien creditors may assert their rights as redemptioners.
  • Tomasko v. Cotton 273 N.W. 628 Minn. 1937
  • Tomasko v. Cotton 273 N.W. 628 Minn. 1937
    The following cases are helpful: Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , ; Parke v. Hush, 29 Minn. 434 , ; Limnell v. Limnell, 176 Minn. 393, 398 , .
  • Taber v. Rathbun 210 N.W. 95 Minn. 1926
  • Taber v. Rathbun 210 N.W. 95 Minn. 1926
    Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , , is to the same effect.
  • Schill v. Korthof 180 N.W. 703 Minn. 1920
  • Schill v. Korthof 180 N.W. 703 Minn. 1920
    This was held in Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , , cited by the trial court in its memorandum, and again in Moore v. Penney, 141 Minn. 454 , , 3 L.R.A.
  • Moore v. Penney 170 N.W. 599 Minn. 1919
  • Moore v. Penney 170 N.W. 599 Minn. 1919
    Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , ; Parke v. Hush, 29 Minn. 434 , ; Buchanan v. Reid, 43 Minn. 172 , ; Ritchie v. Ege, 58 Minn. 291 , ; Bagley v. McCarthy Brothers Co. 95 Minn. 286 , .
  • Bartleson v. Munson 117 N.W. 512 Minn. 1908
  • Bartleson v. Munson 117 N.W. 512 Minn. 1908
    The evident pur pose of this statutory plan for redemption by creditors through a kin of auction sale is to make the land bring its utmost value while pre serving the rights of each creditor according to the seniority of hi lien.- '-Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , ; Sprague v. Martin, 29 Minn. 226 , ; Todd v. Johnson, 56 Minn. 60 , .
  • Bagley v. McCarthy Bros. 104 N.W. 7 Minn. 1905
  • Bagley v. McCarthy Bros. 104 N.W. 7 Minn. 1905
    Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , ; Parke v. Hush, 29 Minn. 434 , ; Buchanan v. Reid, 43 Minn. 172 , ; Sprandel v. Houde, 54 Minn. 308 , ; Ritchie v. Ege, 58 Minn. 291 , .
  • Ritchie v. Ege 59 N.W. 1020 Minn. 1894
  • Ritchie v. Ege 59 N.W. 1020 Minn. 1894
    ailed to put himself in the line of redemptioners, by filing notice to redeem in the proper office, the statute does not require him to do so, but that said section 324 requires the plaintiff, on redeeming, besides pay *297 ing said amount so bid, and interest, to pay also “all liens prior to his own, held by the party from whom such redemption is made;” and that the cases of Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , ( ;) Parke v. Hush, 29 Minn. 434 , ( ;) and Buchanan v. Reid, 43 Minn. 172 , ( ,)—hol
  • Buchanan v. Reid 45 N.W. 11 Minn. 1890
  • Buchanan v. Reid 45 N.W. 11 Minn. 1890
    The first of these propositions is disposed of by the decision in Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 , ( 9 N. W. Rep.
  • Parke v. Hush 13 N.W. 668 Minn. 1882
  • Parke v. Hush 13 N.W. 668 Minn. 1882
    Unless there is something to distinguish the case from Pamperin v. Scanlan, *436 28 Minn. 345 , the defendant could, under his judgment lien, redeem from the sale under the first judgment, without paying the amount bid by plaintiff upon the sale under the second judgment.
  • Sprague v. Martin 13 N.W. 34 Minn. 1882
  • Sprague v. Martin 13 N.W. 34 Minn. 1882
    Pamperin v. Scanlan, 28 Minn. 345 ; Van Rensselaer v. Sheriff of Albany, 1 Cow.