Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Weaver v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co., 11 N.W. 114.

32 citing documents.

Spaeth v. City of Plymouth 344 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1984
Spaeth v. City of Plymouth 344 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1984
557 (1871); Nelson v. Wilson, 239 Minn. 164, 169 , Weaver v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534, 539-41 , 11 N.W.
Mitchell v. City of St. Paul 31 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1948
Mitchell v. City of St. Paul 31 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1948
Weaver v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , ; In re Minnetonka Lake Improvement [Carpenter v. Board of Co. Commrs.], 56 Minn. 513 , [45 A. S. R. 494]; Carlson v. St.
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley 12 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1943
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley 12 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1943
That case was cited and followed by this court in Weaver v. Mississippi Rum River Boom Co. 28 Minn. 534 , 539 , 11 N.W.
Heiberg v. Wild Rice Boom Co. 148 N.W. 517 Minn. 1914
Heiberg v. Wild Rice Boom Co. 148 N.W. 517 Minn. 1914
Weaver v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co. 28 Minn. 534 , ; 2 Notes on Minn. Reports, 253.
Torgerson v. Crookston Lumber Co. 144 N.W. 154 Minn. 1913
Torgerson v. Crookston Lumber Co. 144 N.W. 154 Minn. 1913
610; Weaver v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co. 28 Minn. 534, 540 , .
Casey v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 122 N.W. 376 Minn. 1909
Casey v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 122 N.W. 376 Minn. 1909
Weaver v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , ; McKenzie v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 29 Minn. 288 , ; Hueston v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 76 Minn. 251 , ; Bowers v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 78 Minn. 398 , , 79 Am.
Hueston v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 79 N.W. 92 Minn. 1899
Hueston v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 79 N.W. 92 Minn. 1899
Weaver v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , .
Gravel v. Little Falls Improvement & Navigation Co. 77 N.W. 217 Minn. 1898
Gravel v. Little Falls Improvement & Navigation Co. 77 N.W. 217 Minn. 1898
Weaver v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , ; In re Minnetonka Lake Improvement, 56 Minn. 513 , ; Carlson v. St.
Carlson v. St. Louis River Dam & Improvement Co. 75 N.W. 1044 Minn. 1898
Carlson v. St. Louis River Dam & Improvement Co. 75 N.W. 1044 Minn. 1898
“The state has not the right, without making compensation, to take or destroy the property of riparian owners in making a water course navigable when it is not so by nature, or in appropriating *133 such water course to the public use by artificial erections or improvements.” Weaver v Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534, 538 , .
Coyne v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 75 N.W. 748 Minn. 1898
Coyne v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 75 N.W. 748 Minn. 1898
We infer that the court relied upon the case of Weaver v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , , when using this *535 language.
Tate v. City of St. Paul 58 N.W. 158 Minn. 1894
Tate v. City of St. Paul 58 N.W. 158 Minn. 1894
That making one’s premises a place of deposit for the surplus waters in the sewers in times of high water, or creating a nuisance upon them so as to deprive the owner of the beneficial use of his property, is an appropriation requiring compensation to be made, see Weaver v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , ( .)
Carpenter v. Board of County Com'rs 58 N.W. 295 Minn. 1894
Carpenter v. Board of County Com'rs 58 N.W. 295 Minn. 1894
Weaver v. Rum River Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , ( .)
McCullough v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Ry. Co. 53 N.W. 802 Minn. 1892
McCullough v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Ry. Co. 53 N.W. 802 Minn. 1892
Weaver v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , ( 11 N. W. Rep.
Swanson v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 44 N.W. 986 Minn. 1890
Swanson v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 44 N.W. 986 Minn. 1890
& Rum River Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 , ( 11 N. W. Rep.
Osborne v. Knife Falls Boom Corp. 21 N.W. 704 Minn. 1884
Osborne v. Knife Falls Boom Corp. 21 N.W. 704 Minn. 1884
& Rum River Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 ; Stevens Point Boom Co. v. Reilly, supra; Cohn v. Wausau Boom Co., supra; Watts v. Tittabawassee Boom Co., supra; Duluth Lumber Co. v. St.
McKenzie v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 13 N.W. 123 Minn. 1882
McKenzie v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. 13 N.W. 123 Minn. 1882
& Rum River Boom Co., 28 Minn. 534 .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by