Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baldwin v. Rogers, 11 N.W. 77.
- Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Finn v. Alliance Bank
838 N.W.2d 585
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Compare Baldwin v. O’Laughlin, 28 Minn. 544, 548-49 , 11 N.W.
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Petersen 748 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Petersen
748 N.W.2d 306
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Baldwin v. O’Laughlin, 28 Minn. 544, 549 , 11 N.W.
- Roberts v. Friedell 15 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1944
-
Roberts v. Friedell
15 N.W.2d 496
Minn. 1944
See, Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; 24 Am.
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Cook 206 N.W. 170 Minn. 1925
-
Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Cook
206 N.W. 170
Minn. 1925
See Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , , and, aside from this, the evidence did not require a finding of fraud, and the finding that there was no fraud is sustained.
- First National Bank v. Morrow 201 N.W. 442 Minn. 1925
-
First National Bank v. Morrow
201 N.W. 442
Minn. 1925
Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296 , ; Aretz v. Kloos, 89 Minn. 432 , ; Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , .
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Murphy 114 N.W. 360 Minn. 1908
-
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Murphy
114 N.W. 360
Minn. 1908
Nor are the cases of Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , , Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193 , , Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296 , , and Arctz v. Kloos, 89 Minn. 432 , , here in point; for they are based'upon the fact, clearly established in each particular case, that the debtor’s land was mortgaged for more than its va
- Aretz v. Kloos 95 N.W. 216 Minn. 1903
-
Aretz v. Kloos
95 N.W. 216
Minn. 1903
In Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544, 549 , , it was- said: “To make a debtor's transfer of property fraudulent as respects his creditors, there’ must be an intent to defraud, express or implied, and an act which, if allowed to stand, will actually defraud them, by hindering, delaying, or preventing the collection of their claims.”^ In Blake
- Keith v. Albrecht 94 N.W. 677 Minn. 1903
-
Keith v. Albrecht
94 N.W. 677
Minn. 1903
Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Horton v. Kelly, supra.
- Fryberger v. Berven 92 N.W. 1125 Minn. 1903
-
Fryberger v. Berven
92 N.W. 1125
Minn. 1903
In support of this contention, they cite the cases of Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193 , ; Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296 , ; Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Pikop, 56 Minn. 532 , .
- Spooner v. Travelers Insurance 79 N.W. 305 Minn. 1899
-
Spooner v. Travelers Insurance
79 N.W. 305
Minn. 1899
Counsel, in support of this claim, rely upon the cases of Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193 , ; Aultman & T. Co. v. Pikop, 56 Minn. 531 , .
- Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Pikop 58 N.W. 551 Minn. 1894
-
Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Pikop
58 N.W. 551
Minn. 1894
Gilfillan, C. J. This case comes within Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ( ;) Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193 , ( ;) and Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296 , ( ,)—in -which it was held that a creditor is not defrauded by his debtor conveying real estate incumbered beyond its value, and that the conveyance is not void, though made with intent to defraud s
- Blake v. Boisjoli 53 N.W. 637 Minn. 1892
-
Blake v. Boisjoli
53 N.W. 637
Minn. 1892
As was said in Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ( 11 N. W. Rep.
- Horton v. Kelly 41 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1889
-
Horton v. Kelly
41 N.W. 1031
Minn. 1889
The court was asked to set aside the alleged fraudulent conveyance to the end that the premises might be sold, and the proceeds applied to the satisfaction of plaintiff’s judgment, but, following the rule laid down in Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ( 11 N. W. Rep.