Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baldwin v. Rogers, 11 N.W. 77.

26 citing documents.

  • Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
  • Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
    Compare Baldwin v. O’Laughlin, 28 Minn. 544, 548-49 , 11 N.W.
  • Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Petersen 748 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Petersen 748 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    Baldwin v. O’Laughlin, 28 Minn. 544, 549 , 11 N.W.
  • Roberts v. Friedell 15 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1944
  • Roberts v. Friedell 15 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1944
    See, Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; 24 Am.
  • Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Cook 206 N.W. 170 Minn. 1925
  • Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Cook 206 N.W. 170 Minn. 1925
    See Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , , and, aside from this, the evidence did not require a finding of fraud, and the finding that there was no fraud is sustained.
  • First National Bank v. Morrow 201 N.W. 442 Minn. 1925
  • First National Bank v. Morrow 201 N.W. 442 Minn. 1925
    Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296 , ; Aretz v. Kloos, 89 Minn. 432 , ; Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , .
  • Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Murphy 114 N.W. 360 Minn. 1908
  • Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Murphy 114 N.W. 360 Minn. 1908
    Nor are the cases of Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , , Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193 , , Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296 , , and Arctz v. Kloos, 89 Minn. 432 , , here in point; for they are based'upon the fact, clearly established in each particular case, that the debtor’s land was mortgaged for more than its va
  • Aretz v. Kloos 95 N.W. 216 Minn. 1903
  • Aretz v. Kloos 95 N.W. 216 Minn. 1903
    In Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544, 549 , , it was- said: “To make a debtor's transfer of property fraudulent as respects his creditors, there’ must be an intent to defraud, express or implied, and an act which, if allowed to stand, will actually defraud them, by hindering, delaying, or preventing the collection of their claims.”^ In Blake
  • Keith v. Albrecht 94 N.W. 677 Minn. 1903
  • Keith v. Albrecht 94 N.W. 677 Minn. 1903
    Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Horton v. Kelly, supra.
  • Fryberger v. Berven 92 N.W. 1125 Minn. 1903
  • Fryberger v. Berven 92 N.W. 1125 Minn. 1903
    In support of this contention, they cite the cases of Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193 , ; Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296 , ; Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Pikop, 56 Minn. 532 , .
  • Spooner v. Travelers Insurance 79 N.W. 305 Minn. 1899
  • Spooner v. Travelers Insurance 79 N.W. 305 Minn. 1899
    Counsel, in support of this claim, rely upon the cases of Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193 , ; Aultman & T. Co. v. Pikop, 56 Minn. 531 , .
  • Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Pikop 58 N.W. 551 Minn. 1894
  • Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Pikop 58 N.W. 551 Minn. 1894
    Gilfillan, C. J. This case comes within Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ( ;) Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193 , ( ;) and Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296 , ( ,)—in -which it was held that a creditor is not defrauded by his debtor conveying real estate incumbered beyond its value, and that the conveyance is not void, though made with intent to defraud s
  • Blake v. Boisjoli 53 N.W. 637 Minn. 1892
  • Blake v. Boisjoli 53 N.W. 637 Minn. 1892
    As was said in Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ( 11 N. W. Rep.
  • Horton v. Kelly 41 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1889
  • Horton v. Kelly 41 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1889
    The court was asked to set aside the alleged fraudulent conveyance to the end that the premises might be sold, and the proceeds applied to the satisfaction of plaintiff’s judgment, but, following the rule laid down in Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ( 11 N. W. Rep.