Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Cunningham v. District Court of Ramsey County, 11 N.W. 133.

44 citing documents.

Village of Medford v. Wilson 230 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1975
Village of Medford v. Wilson 230 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1975
Paul, 22 Minn. 494 ; State v. District Court of Ramsey Co., 29 Minn. 62 , ; State v. District Court of Ramsey Co., 33 Minn. 164 , ; Janeway v. City of Duluth, 65 Minn. 292 , .
Qvale v. City of Willmar 25 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1946
Qvale v. City of Willmar 25 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1946
Cunningham v. District Court, 29 Minn. 62 , .
Nelson v. City of Willmar 276 N.W. 234 Minn. 1937
Nelson v. City of Willmar 276 N.W. 234 Minn. 1937
Cunningham v. District Court, 29 Minn. 62 .
State v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 270 N.W. 609 Minn. 1936
State v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 270 N.W. 609 Minn. 1936
State v. Board of Public Works, 27 Minn. 442 , , and State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 , .
In Re Appeal of Meyer 223 N.W. 135 Minn. 1929
In Re Appeal of Meyer 223 N.W. 135 Minn. 1929
Cunningham v. District Court, 29 Minn. 62 , 65 , 11 N.W.
In Re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Paving & Improving Robert & Other Streets 204 N.W. 558 Minn. 1925
In Re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Paving & Improving Robert & Other Streets 204 N.W. 558 Minn. 1925
Paul, 20 Minn. 459 (511); State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 , ; and Norwood v. Baker, 172 U. S. 269 , 19 Sup.
In re Appeal of Meyer from Confirmation of Paving Assessment 197 N.W. 970 Minn. 1924
In re Appeal of Meyer from Confirmation of Paving Assessment 197 N.W. 970 Minn. 1924
State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 (67), .
State v. Koochiching Realty Co. 177 N.W. 940 Minn. 1920
State v. Koochiching Realty Co. 177 N.W. 940 Minn. 1920
State v. Board of Public Works, 27 Minn. 442 , , and State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 , .
Hughes v. Farnsworth 163 N.W. 525 Minn. 1917
Hughes v. Farnsworth 163 N.W. 525 Minn. 1917
App. 276 , 153 S. W. 1086 , the statute under consideration required the whole cost of the improvement to be assessed against abutting property “in proportion to the front foot.” In State v. District Court, 29 Minn. 62 , , in the distribution of the cost of guttering, which was required on only part of a street to be graded, an arbitrary assessment of the amount on a frontage rule against the abutting property was.made.
Mayer v. City of Shakopee 130 N.W. 77 Minn. 1911
Mayer v. City of Shakopee 130 N.W. 77 Minn. 1911
State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 , ; State v. Judges of District Court, 51 Minn. 539 , , .
City of Stillwater v. Henningsen 123 N.W. 289 Minn. 1909
City of Stillwater v. Henningsen 123 N.W. 289 Minn. 1909
State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 33 Minn. 164 , ; State v. City of Hastings, 24 Minn. 78 ; State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 , ; City of Duluth v. Krupp, 46 Minn. 435 , ; Wathen v. Allison, 213 Ill.
State ex rel. Eaton v. District Court 104 N.W. 553 Minn. 1905
State ex rel. Eaton v. District Court 104 N.W. 553 Minn. 1905
State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 , ; State v. Judges of District Court, 51 Minn. 539 , , .
State ex rel. Hughes v. District Court 103 N.W. 744 Minn. 1905
State ex rel. Hughes v. District Court 103 N.W. 744 Minn. 1905
Paul, 23 Minn. 232 ; State v. Board of Public Works, 27 Minn. 442 , State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 , ; State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 33 Minn. 164 , ; State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 80 Minn. 293 , .
Diamond v. City of Mankato 93 N.W. 911 Minn. 1903
Diamond v. City of Mankato 93 N.W. 911 Minn. 1903
Paul, 22 Minn. 494 ; State v. District Court of Ramsey Co., 29 Minn. 62 , ; State v. District Court of Ramsey Co., 33 Minn. 164 , ; Janeway v. City of Duluth, 65 Minn. 292 , .
State v. Weyerhauser 68 Minn. 353 Minn. 1897
State v. Weyerhauser 68 Minn. 353 Minn. 1897
We go further, and hold, as was considered in respect to special assessments under a city charter in State v. Board, 27 Minn. 442 , , and State v. District, 29 Minn. 62 , , that, even though no intentional fraud be proved, it may be shown in defense that the error in the assessment was so gross that it cannot be accounted for upon any ground of mere misjudgment of value, but must have resulted, if not from fraud, from what in the case first cited above was called a ‘demo
State ex rel. Shannon v. Judges of District Court of Eleventh Judicial District 53 N.W. 800 Minn. 1892
State ex rel. Shannon v. Judges of District Court of Eleventh Judicial District 53 N.W. 800 Minn. 1892
State v. District Court, 29 Minn. 62 , ( 11 N. W. Rep.
County of Otter Tail v. Batchelder 50 N.W. 536 Minn. 1891
County of Otter Tail v. Batchelder 50 N.W. 536 Minn. 1891
161 ,) and State v. District Court of Ramsey Co., 29 Minn. 62 , ( 11 N. W. Rep.
State ex rel. Burger v. District Court of Ramsey County 23 N.W. 222 Minn. 1885
State ex rel. Burger v. District Court of Ramsey County 23 N.W. 222 Minn. 1885
For example, in State v. District Court of Ramsey Co., 29 Minn. 62 , it was considered that gutters and culverts might be included with grading.
State ex rel. Merrick v. District Court of Hennepin County 22 N.W. 625 Minn. 1885
State ex rel. Merrick v. District Court of Hennepin County 22 N.W. 625 Minn. 1885
State v. District Court of Ramsey Co., 29 Minn. 62, 65 , and cases cited.
State ex rel. Lewis v. District Court of Ramsey County 22 N.W. 295 Minn. 1885
State ex rel. Lewis v. District Court of Ramsey County 22 N.W. 295 Minn. 1885
Paul, 23 Minn. 232 ; State v. Board of Public Works, 27 Minn. 442 ; State v. District Court, 29 Minn. 62 .
State ex rel. Benz v. District Court 19 N.W. 732 Minn. 1884
State ex rel. Benz v. District Court 19 N.W. 732 Minn. 1884
Paul, 27 Minn. 442; State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 .
Mayall v. City of St. Paul 15 N.W. 170 Minn. 1883
Mayall v. City of St. Paul 15 N.W. 170 Minn. 1883
In State v. District Court Ramsey County, 29 Minn. 62 , we held further that only such determinations of tbe board, of public works as were made in tbe exercise of tbe power conferred upon it were conclusive.