Cited by

While it was a simple matter of arithmetic to determine that she would not be able to pay the $200 a month out of the rents and her other income and have anything left to live upon, and while of course, as said by this court, speaking through Mr. Justice Mitchell, in Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241, 242 , , as long as plaintiff possessed the legal capacity to make a contract, the mere matter of disparity of intelligence and business experience is not of itself a sufficient ground for relief, yet

*365 Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , , and Sunset Orchard Land Co. v. Sherman Nursery Co. 121 Minn. 5 , , cited by plaintiff, are of no avail to it.

Cummings v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 228, 231 (246); Perkins v. Trinka, 30 *31 Minn. 241, ; Jaggar v. Winslow, 30 Minn. 263 , ; Valley v. Crookston Lbr.

Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , ; Kelley v. Hopkins, 105 Minn. 155 , ; Sunset Orchard Land Co. v. Sherman Nursery Co. 121 Minn. 5 , .

Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , , is an illustration of the-doctrine where the rights of the parties were doubtful.

The case is unlike Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241, 243 , , cited by appellant, where the parties settled and compromised doubtful and questionable rights.

Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , ; Hinkle v. Minneapolis & St.

There was no duress in this case on any of the authorities, and a contention that there was is disposed of by calling attention to Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , ; De Graff v. County of Ramsey, 46 Minn. 319 , ; Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , .

452 ;) Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241, 243 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.

We are unable to see that this case differs in principle from Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.

Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241, ( 15 N. W. Rep.

nor mistake of fact, and as the parties had equal means of ascertaining what their respective rights were, the courts.must uphold any compromise of such rights, “although a judicial decision should afterwards be m'ade showing that these rights were different from what they supposed them to be, or showing that one of them really had no rights at all, and so nothing to forego.” Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.

Perkins v. Trinka, 30 Minn. 241 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.