Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 15 N.W. 243.
- Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co. 287 N.W. 15 Minn. 1939
-
Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.
287 N.W. 15
Minn. 1939
See Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ; Wright v. Larson, 51 Minn. 321 , , 38 A. S. R. 504.
- Griffin v. Minnesota Sugar Company 202 N.W. 445 Minn. 1925
-
Griffin v. Minnesota Sugar Company
202 N.W. 445
Minn. 1925
s executed in good faith, and not for the purpose of hindering, delaying, or defrauding any creditor of the mortgagor, and unless, in addition thereto, the giving of such mortgage is accompanied by immediate delivery and followed by actual and continued change of possession of the mortgaged property, or, in lieu thereof, the mortgage is filed as hereinafter provided.” Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , , is cited which holds a mortgage first executed, but not filed until after a second
- King Cattle Co. v. Joseph 198 N.W. 798 Minn. 1924
-
King Cattle Co. v. Joseph
198 N.W. 798
Minn. 1924
Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ; Drew v. Wheelihan, 75 Minn. 68 , ; Marotta v. Duluth News Tribune, 116 Minn. 51 , .
- Fifield v. Norton 82 N.W. 581 Minn. 1900
-
Fifield v. Norton
82 N.W. 581
Minn. 1900
Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , .
- Nickerson v. Wells-Stone Mercantile Co. 73 N.W. 959 Minn. 1898
-
Nickerson v. Wells-Stone Mercantile Co.
73 N.W. 959
Minn. 1898
Bank v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 ; McNeil v. Finnegan, 33 Minn. 375 ; Wright v. Larson, 51 Minn. 321 ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 .
- Mead v. Randall 71 N.W. 31 Minn. 1897
-
Mead v. Randall
71 N.W. 31
Minn. 1897
Bank v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ; Roussain v. Patten, 46 Minn. 308 , ; Wright v. Larson, 51 Minn. 321 , .
- Plymouth Cordage Co. v. Seymour 69 N.W. 1079 Minn. 1897
-
Plymouth Cordage Co. v. Seymour
69 N.W. 1079
Minn. 1897
Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , .
- Wright v. Larson 53 N.W. 712 Minn. 1892
-
Wright v. Larson
53 N.W. 712
Minn. 1892
The burden was undoubtedly upon plaintiff, a subsequent mortgagee, as against intervener, a prior mortgagee, to prove that he took his mortgage in good faith; and, under the decisions of this court, “good faith” in such cases means “without notice,” as well as “for a valuable consideration.” Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
- Mullen v. Noonan 47 N.W. 164 Minn. 1890
-
Mullen v. Noonan
47 N.W. 164
Minn. 1890
This was so decided in Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
- Dyer v. Thorstad 29 N.W. 345 Minn. 1886
-
Dyer v. Thorstad
29 N.W. 345
Minn. 1886
647 ;) Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
- McNeil v. Finnegan 23 N.W. 540 Minn. 1885
-
McNeil v. Finnegan
23 N.W. 540
Minn. 1885
Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 ; Tolbert v. Horton, 31 Minn. 518 .
- Tolbert v. Horton 18 N.W. 647 Minn. 1884
-
Tolbert v. Horton
18 N.W. 647
Minn. 1884
The effect of the statute asa registry law is not here involved; and we need only say that its object and purpose, so far as subsequent purchasers and mortgagees are concerned, is to protect them against secret or unknown conveyances by reason of which they, purchasing in ignorance of prior vested rights, might be prejudiced, (Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 ,) and that, under such statutes, actual notice of the prior conveyance has generally, if not always, been deemed to make the fac
- Jordan v. Humphrey 18 N.W. 450 Minn. 1884
-
Jordan v. Humphrey
18 N.W. 450
Minn. 1884
Minor v. Willoughby, 3 Minn. 154 , (225;) Bank of Farmington v. Ellis, 30 Minn. 270 .