Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 15 N.W. 249.

36 citing documents.

Robinson v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Robinson v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
That statute is in accord with the decision in Cushing v. Seymour, [ 30 Minn. 301 ], 15 N.W.
Bloomquist v. First National Bank of Elk River 378 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bloomquist v. First National Bank of Elk River 378 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301, 304-05 , 15 N.W.
Halin v. Dahlgren 195 N.W. 765 Minn. 1923
Halin v. Dahlgren 195 N.W. 765 Minn. 1923
Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co. 30 Minn. 301 , .
Force v. Gottwald 183 N.W. 356 Minn. 1921
Force v. Gottwald 183 N.W. 356 Minn. 1921
Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co. 30 Minn. 301 , ; Doud, Sons & Co. v. Duluth Milling Co. 55 Minn. 53 , ; Cargill v. Thompson, 57 Minn. 534 , ; Casper v. Klippen, 61 Minn. 353 , , 52 Am.
Carlson v. Schoch 170 N.W. 195 Minn. 1918
Carlson v. Schoch 170 N.W. 195 Minn. 1918
Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co. 30 Minn. 301 , ; Torp v. Gulseth, 37 Minn. 135 , ; Deal v. D. M. Osborne & Co. 42 Minn. 102 , ; Berg v. Olson, 88 Minn. 392 , ; Bowers, Conversion, § 682; 2 Sedgwick, Damages, § 497e; Jones, Chattel Mortgages, § 449a; 28 Am.
Jankowitz v. Kaplan 165 N.W. 275 Minn. 1917
Jankowitz v. Kaplan 165 N.W. 275 Minn. 1917
Plaintiff cites in support of the point Powell v. Gagnon, 52 Minn. 232 , , and Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co. 30 Minn. 301 , .
Anderson v. Willson 157 N.W. 582 Minn. 1916
Anderson v. Willson 157 N.W. 582 Minn. 1916
Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co. 30 Minn. 301, 307 , .
Independent Brewing Ass'n v. Burt 123 N.W. 932 Minn. 1909
Independent Brewing Ass'n v. Burt 123 N.W. 932 Minn. 1909
604; Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301 , ; O’Neill v. Johnson, 53 Minn. 439 , , 39 Am.
Emerson v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co. 104 N.W. 573 Minn. 1905
Emerson v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co. 104 N.W. 573 Minn. 1905
ow damages for prevented gains in this case, as the trial court has done here, and deny them, as this court did, in cases of wrongful seizure by an attachment (Casper v. Klippen, 61 Minn. 353 , ; Lowenstein v. Monroe, 55 Iowa, 82 , ), or by replevin (Williams v. Wood, 55 Minn. 323 , ), or in cases of conversion generally (Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301 , ), or in cases of actionable negligence (Simmer v. City of St.
Berg v. Olson 93 N.W. 309 Minn. 1903
Berg v. Olson 93 N.W. 309 Minn. 1903
Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301 , ; Powell v. Gagnon, 52 Minn. 232 , .
Casper v. Klippen 63 N.W. 737 Minn. 1895
Casper v. Klippen 63 N.W. 737 Minn. 1895
Paul, 23 Minn. 408 ; Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301 , ; O’Neill v. Johnson, 53 Minn. 439 , ; Williams v. Wood, 55 Minn. 323 , .
Williams v. Wood 56 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1893
Williams v. Wood 56 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1893
The defendant was permitted to state the amount of his damages upon the basis referred to and commented upon in Cushing v. Seymour, *328 30 Minn. 301 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
O'Neill v. Johnson 55 N.W. 601 Minn. 1893
O'Neill v. Johnson 55 N.W. 601 Minn. 1893
Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
Powell v. Gagnon 53 N.W. 1148 Minn. 1893
Powell v. Gagnon 53 N.W. 1148 Minn. 1893
513 ;) Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
King v. Lacrosse 44 N.W. 517 Minn. 1890
King v. Lacrosse 44 N.W. 517 Minn. 1890
172 ;) Cushing v. Seymour, 30 Minn. 301 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
Deal v. D. M. Osborne & Co. 43 N.W. 835 Minn. 1889
Deal v. D. M. Osborne & Co. 43 N.W. 835 Minn. 1889
Cushing v. Seymour, 30 Minn. 301 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
Torp v. Gulseth 33 N.W. 550 Minn. 1887
Torp v. Gulseth 33 N.W. 550 Minn. 1887
Cushing v. Seymour, 30 Minn. 301 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
Webb v. Michener 19 N.W. 82 Minn. 1884
Webb v. Michener 19 N.W. 82 Minn. 1884
373; Bond v. Corbett, 2 Minn. 209 , (248;) Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co., 30 Minn. 301 .